Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070386›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2024

Differences in own-face but not own-name discrimination between autistic and neurotypical adults: A fast periodic visual stimulation-EEG study.

Annabel D Nijhof, Caroline Catmur, Rebecca Brewer, Michel-Pierre Coll, Jan R Wiersema, Geoffrey Bird

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intact Neural Responding to Hearing One's Own Name in Children with Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Annabel D NijhofSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology. Ghent University, Belgium. Electronic address: Annabel.Nijhof@ugent.be.
Caroline CatmurDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Rebecca BrewerDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
Michel-Pierre CollSchool of Psychology, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
Jan R WiersemaDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology. Ghent University, Belgium.
Geoffrey BirdDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, UK.
King's College London · GBGhent University · BERoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S003509/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-related processing is thought to be altered in autism, with several studies reporting that autistic individuals show a diminished neural response relative to neurotypicals for their own name and face. However, evidence remains scarce and is mostly based on event-related potential studies. Here, we used EEG to measure the neural activity of autistic adults (20 for faces, 27 for names) and neurotypical adults (24 for faces, 25 for names) while they were watching rapidly alternating faces and names, through a relatively new technique called Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation. We presented strangers' faces or names at a base frequency of 5.77 Hz, while one's own, a close other's, and a specific stranger's face/name was presented at an oddball frequency of 1.154 Hz. The neurotypical group showed a significantly greater response to their own face than both close other and stranger faces, and a greater response for close other than for stranger faces. In contrast, in the autism group, own and close other faces showed stronger responses than the stranger's face, but the difference between own and close other faces was not significant in a bilateral parieto-occipital cluster. No group differences in the enhanced response to familiar names were found. These results replicate and extend results obtained using traditional electroencephalographic techniques which suggest atypical responses to self-relevant stimuli in autism.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderNamesAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansPhotic StimulationAutismElectroencephalographyFPVSOwn faceOwn name

Identifiers

PMID38070386
PMCPMC11068592
OpenAlexW4388845471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.