Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070297›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2024

Validating computer-generated measures of linguistic style matching and accommodation in patient-clinician communication.

Salar Khaleghzadegan, Michael Rosen, Anne Links, Alya Ahmad, Molly Kilcullen, Emily Boss, Mary Catherine Beach, Somnath Saha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Salar KhaleghzadeganArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA. Electronic address: skhaleg1@jhmi.edu.
Michael RosenArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anne LinksDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alya AhmadDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Molly KilcullenArmstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emily BossDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mary Catherine BeachDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Somnath SahaDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, USA.

Funding

Developing Novel Linguistic Analytic Methods to Optimize Relationship Quality and Equity in HIV CareR21MH126714 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEACH, MARY CATHERINE · 2021 to 2022
$450k
Understanding Clinician-Parent Interaction to Reduce Disparities and Improve Quality of Pediatric Surgical CareR21HD108565 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOSS, EMILY FRANCES · 2023 to 2024
$347k
Applying Novel Analytic Methods to Address the Impact of Race on Patient-Provider CommunicationI21HX003376 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAHA, SOMNATH · 2021 to 2025
–
HSRD VA I21 HX003376NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD108565NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH126714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the validity of computer-analyzed linguistic style matching (LSM) in patient-clinician communication.

methodsUsing 330 transcribed HIV patient encounters, we quantified word use with Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a dictionary-based text analysis software. We measured LSM by calculating the degree to which clinicians matched patients in the use of LIWC "function words" (e.g., articles, pronouns). We tested associations of different LSM metrics with patients' perceptions that their clinicians spoke similiarly to them.

resultsWe developed 3 measures of LSM: 1) at the whole-visit level; (2) at the turn-by-turn level; and (3) using a "rolling-window" approach, measuring matching between clusters of 8 turns per conversant. None of these measures was associated with patient-rated speech similarity. However, we found that increasing trajectories of LSM, from beginning to end of the visit, were associated with higher patient-rated speech similarity (β 0.35, CI 0.06, 0.64), compared to unchanging trajectories.

conclusionsOur findings point to the potential value of clinicians' adapting their communication style to match their patients, over the course of the visit. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: With further validation, computer-based linguistic analyses may prove an efficient tool for generating data on communication patterns and providing feedback to clinicians in real time.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsCommunicationComputersHumansLanguageLinguisticsLinguistic accommodationLinguistic style matchingPatient-clinician communicationPatient perception

Identifiers

PMID38070297
PMCPMC11349046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.