ArticleJournal of biomechanics2024
Balance strategies for recovery from perturbed overground walking.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A modeling approach to understanding poor stability in people with vestibular hypofunction.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
- Walking balance recovery in people with unilateral vestibular hypofunction.Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation · 2025Article
- Modelling strategies supplemental to foot placement for frontal-plane stability in walking.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Design and Performance Analysis of a Mecanum-Built Perturbation-Based Balance Training Device.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bipedal locomotion is naturally unstable and requires active control. Walking is believed to be primarily stabilized through the selection of foot placements; however, other strategies are available, including regulation of ankle inversion/eversion, ankle push-off, and angular momentum through trunk postural adjustments. The roles of these strategies in maintaining overall stability are often masked by the dominant foot placement strategy. The objectives of this study were to describe how the four strategies are used to respond to medial or lateral ground perturbations during overground walking in healthy individuals and determine reliance on each strategy. Fifteen healthy adults walked with and without perturbations applied to the right foot at heel strike while body kinematics and surface electromyographic activity were measured. Medial perturbations resulted in decreased step width on the first step after the perturbation, increased ankle inversion, increased ankle push-off, and rightward trunk sway. Lateral perturbations resulted in increased step width, decreased ankle inversion, no change in ankle push-off, and leftward trunk sway. EMG activity was consistent with the observed strategies (e.g. increased peroneus longus EMG activity during ankle eversion) with the exception of increased bilateral erector spinae activity for all perturbations. Foot placement was the dominant strategy in response to perturbations, with other strategies showing reduced, yet significant, roles. This work demonstrates that multiple strategies are recruited to improve the balance response in addition to foot placement alone. These results can serve as a reference for future studies of populations with impaired balance to identify potential deficits in strategy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.