Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070146›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Assessing the Pragmatic Effectiveness and Implementation of Click City: Tobacco: A School-Based Prevention Program Targeting Youth Cigarette and E-cigarette Use.

Judy A Andrews, Judith S Gordon, Erika Westling, David Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judy A AndrewsInfluents Innovations, Springfield, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-3756
Judith S GordonUniversity of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Erika WestlingInfluents Innovations, Springfield, OR, USA.
David SmithInfluents Innovations, Springfield, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-6114
Oregon Research Institute · USHealth Innovations (United States) · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Intranet-Based Tobacco Prevention Program for ChildrenR01CA098555 · NCI · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ANDREWS, JUDY A · 2004 to 2011
$4.1M
Expanding the Click City: Tobacco Prevention Program to Include E-cigarettes and Other Novel Tobacco ProductsR44DA044025 · NIDA · OREGON RES BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION STRAT · PI ANDREWS, JUDY A, GORDON, JUDITH SARAH · 2018 to 2020
$1.6M
National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health R01 CA98555National Institute of Drug abuse at the National Institutes of Health R44 DA04402NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098555NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA044025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiven the rapid increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use among youth, we updated Click City: Tobacco, an existing, efficacious, online tobacco prevention program for 5th graders with a 6th-grade booster, to also target e-cigarette use.

methodsTo evaluate the effectiveness of the updated 5th-grade program within a "real world" setting, we conducted a pragmatic randomized trial with 5th-grade students in 43 schools across Arizona and Oregon, assessing change in intentions and willingness to use e-cigarettes/cigarettes, from baseline to one-week post-intervention. Students in intervention schools (n = 1327) received the updated version of Click City: Tobacco; students in control schools (n = 1346) received their usual tobacco prevention curriculum.

resultsStudents in intervention schools significantly decreased their intentions and willingness to use e-cigarettes and cigarettes, compared to students in control schools. The intervention also significantly changed all targeted etiological mechanisms predictive of intentions and willingness. The intervention was more effective for at-risk students, as defined by student's previous tobacco use, current family use of tobacco, and/or high in sensation-seeking. The effects of the intervention on all outcomes were similar as a function of state, gender, ethnicity, and historical timing (before COVID-19 pandemic school closures vs. after schools re-opened). Close to 90% of the students in the intervention condition completed the entire program, supporting fidelity of implementation, and teachers reported satisfaction with the program.

conclusionsFindings suggest that Click City: Tobacco is effective for all 5th-grade students and can be delivered with fidelity across school settings. IMPLICATIONS: The results of a randomized pragmatic effectiveness trial showed that the updated Click City: Tobacco program decreased intentions and willingness to both vape e-cigarettes and smoke cigarettes among 5th-grade students, particularly for those at high risk. Program effectiveness and lack of differences because of factors such as state, gender, ethnicity, and historical timing have universal implications, suggesting that all students can benefit from this program. Click City: Tobacco received high ratings of program satisfaction from teachers and was implemented with fidelity. Findings suggest that Click City: Tobacco is effective and can be easily implemented in schools.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesStudentsAdolescentArizonaChildCigarette SmokingCOVID-19Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansIntentionMaleOregonProgram EvaluationSchoolsSmoking Prevention

Identifiers

PMID38070146
PMCPMC11190058
OpenAlexW4389504972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.