ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Efficient intraoral photogrammetry using self-identifying projective invariant marker.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe re-measurement of full-arch implant digital impressions is an important step in denture restoration. This paper provides an efficient oral photogrammetry technology using projective invariant marker, applied in the re-measurement of full-arch implant digital impressions.
methodsWe have developed a self-recognizing marker with projection invariance, along with its detection code. The marker is installed on the scanning body and used for photogrammetric measurements. Triangulation is utilized to determine the 3D coordinates of the marker, followed by a series of post-processing steps to obtain more accurate 3D coordinates.
resultsThe experimental data indicate that the optimal working distance is between 200 and 250 mm, with a minimum measurement error of less than 0.05 mm and an average measurement error of 0.10 mm. The measurement time is less than 2 min.
conclusionsThe experimental results show that the photogrammetric system can obtain reliable positions of full-arch implants with efficient photogrammetry, without the need to enter the patient's oral cavity, and has potential clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38070075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.