Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070071›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

First report of robotic-assisted total hysterectomy using the Hugo™ RAS system.

Hiroaki Komatsu, Ikumi Wada, Tasuku Harada, Fuminori Taniguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimizing arm placement in the HugoUpdates in surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Comparative Analysis of da VinciMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Article
  6. Revolutionary Advances of Robotic Surgery in Urology Field.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki KomatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Y36-1 Nishicho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan. komatsu.h.med@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4507-6848
Ikumi WadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Y36-1 Nishicho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan.
Tasuku HaradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Y36-1 Nishicho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1492-7275
Fuminori TaniguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Y36-1 Nishicho, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-0632
Tottori University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes the first reported treatment of a benign gynecological disease with the Medtronic's Hugo™ RAS System, the first robot-assisted device used in the field of gynecology in Japan. Patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System at the Tottori University Hospital between March 2023 and June 2023 were included in this study. In the first case, the patient was in her 40 s and had uterine fibroids. We describe our experience and compare the device with the conventional da Vinci surgical system. We discuss the key features of the Hugo system (including the independent arms, open console, and pistol-shaped handle), the convenience of robotic surgery, the potential to improve quality of life, and how this technology could revolutionize the field of surgery.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLeiomyomaRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHysterectomyQuality of LifeDa VinciHugo RAS systemHysterectomyRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID38070071
OpenAlexW4389505896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.