Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38070014›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

What's important for recovery after a total knee replacement? A systematic review of mixed methods studies.

Chetan Khatri, Imran Ahmed, Fatema Dhaif, Jeremy Rodrigues, Martin Underwood, Edward T Davis, Paul Mitchell, Andrew Metcalfe

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Monitoring Gait Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Wearable Sensors: Responsiveness of Gait Accelerations.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chetan KhatriClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. Chetan.khatri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3961-1314
Imran AhmedClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Fatema DhaifClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Jeremy RodriguesClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Martin UnderwoodClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Edward T DavisRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Paul MitchellHealth Economics Bristol, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew MetcalfeClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
University of Warwick · GBRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how patients perceive and prioritise various aspects of recovery following total knee replacement, including pain, function and return to activity, will help clinicians in pre-operative consultations by ensuring they effectively address patient concerns and managing their expectations.

aimsThe aim of this study is to identify aspects of recovery that are important to people after a total knee replacement.

methodsStudies were identified from Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. This mixed methods review included all original study types (quantitative, qualitative, discrete choice experiments and mixed methods design). Reviews and non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Studies with participants (age ≥ 18 years) who had a primary TKR for osteoarthritis were included. Studies of people with unicompartmental knee, patella-femoral or revision knee replacement were excluded. Recovery attributes were extracted from individual papers and grouped into recovery themes.

resultsA total of 23 studies with 8404 participants and 18 recovery themes were developed. The most frequently identified overarching theme was pain, followed by activities of daily living, mobility (walking), recreational activities, specific functional movements of the knee, use of walking aids, sexual activity and range of motion of the knee. Medical complications were an infrequently reported theme, however, was deemed to be high importance.

conclusionsReducing pain, returning of activities and daily living and mobility are the three most frequently reported recovery domains for people after TKR. Clinicians should be aware of recovery themes, to ensure they are explored sufficiently when consenting for a TKR. Future research should aim to determine the relative importance of these attributes compared to each other. Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021253699.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRecovery of FunctionHumansOsteoarthritis, KneeRange of Motion, ArticularAttributesDiscrete choice experimentMixed methods reviewTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID38070014
PMCPMC11093842
OpenAlexW4389507040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.