Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068818›Full record

Observational studyNutrients2023

Factors Associated with the Nutritional Status of Women with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Brazilian High Complexity Oncology Center.

Roberto Júnio Gomes Silva, Wesley Rocha Grippa, Luiz Claudio Barreto Silva Neto, Oscar Geovanny Enriquez-Martinez, Júlia Anhoque Cavalcanti Marcarini, Raphael Manhães Pessanha, Fabiano Kenji Haraguchi, Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Social inequalities in survival among women with breast cancer in southeastern Brazil: a retrospective cohort study.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberto Júnio Gomes SilvaGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.
Wesley Rocha GrippaGraduate Program in Public Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-6031
Luiz Claudio Barreto Silva NetoGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.
Oscar Geovanny Enriquez-MartinezGraduate Program in Public Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.
Júlia Anhoque Cavalcanti MarcariniGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.
Raphael Manhães PessanhaGraduate Program in Public Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-0755
Fabiano Kenji HaraguchiGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.
Luís Carlos Lopes-JúniorGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória 29500-000, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-6510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer poses a significant public health concern owing to its high prevalence and the risk of mortality associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional status of women with non-metastatic breast cancer and to identify factors associated with it.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a High Complexity Oncology Assistance Center in the southeast region of Brazil, with the aim of assessing the nutritional status in women undergoing treatment for stage I, II, or III breast cancer. Patients in palliative care or undergoing reconstructive surgery were excluded. Data collection took place between June 2022 and March 2023 and included questionnaires, physical examinations, laboratory tests, and anthropometric assessments. Nutritional status was assessed using measures such as BMI and skinfold thickness, while nutritional risk was assessed using the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) tool.

resultsSignificant associations were found between nutritional risk and educational level (

conclusionsIt is crucial to consider the nutritional status of breast cancer patients, alongside clinical factors, to offer comprehensive and personalized care. Gaining insight into the sociodemographic variables linked to nutritional risk can significantly contribute to our understanding of breast cancer. This knowledge, in turn, can aid in identifying effective strategies for public policy, health promotion, and prevention efforts aimed at tackling this condition.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNutritional StatusBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSurveys and Questionnairesbreast neoplasmsdiet, food, and nutritionfoodnutritional statusrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38068818
PMCPMC10707825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.