Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068496›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Head-Mounted Displays for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.

Giulia Fregna, Chiara Paoluzzi, Andrea Baroni, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Antonino Casile, Sofia Straudi

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virtual Reality Therapy for Upper Limb Motor Impairments in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulia FregnaDoctoral Program in Translational Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Chiara PaoluzziDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Andrea BaroniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-3090
Roberto Cano-de-la-CuerdaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcon, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-4234
Antonino CasileDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7824-9274
Sofia StraudiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2061-9922
University of Ferrara · ITUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

University of Ferrara FAR 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper extremity (UE) paresis is one of the most frequent and disabling clinical consequences after stroke. Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs) are wearable virtual reality devices that seem effective in promoting the recovery of functional abilities by increasing adherence levels in this population. This scoping review is aimed at collecting available evidence on the use of HMD-based immersive virtual reality systems for UE rehabilitation treatment in stroke survivors. Four electronic bibliographic databases were consulted from inception until 18 January 2023. A total of 19 clinical trials in which HMDs were used as a clinical tool for increasing UE functioning, as a single intervention or in adjunct to other rehab treatments, were included; no restrictions were applied for UE paresis severity or stroke onset. The large majority of the clinical trials involved chronic stroke patients (15 out of 19), with a wide range of UE impairments. Overall, HMD use seemed to be well-tolerated and promising for increasing UE motor function in adult chronic stroke survivors, with benefits in subjects' arm use and independence. The possibility of executing highly realistic and task-oriented movements appears to be promising in enhancing gesture relevance, thus promoting new motor strategies in a "virtual ecological way". Across studies, we found a high heterogeneity in protocol design and a lack of reporting that prevents us drawing conclusions regarding potential subgroups of patients that could benefit more from HMD-based interventions or suggested treatment modalities.

Indexed as

head-mounted displayimmersive virtual realitymotor recoverystrokeupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38068496
PMCPMC10706861
OpenAlexW4389190515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.