ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Enhanced Precision in Genioplasty: A Novel Intraoperative Spatial Repositioning Using Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Technology and a Holographic Mixed Reality Application.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimally invasive surgical extraction of an impacted supernumerary tooth in right maxilla with use of a 3D-printed surgical guide and mixed reality: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Augmented Reality in Navigated Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Accuracy and System Performance.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Corrective osteotomy for malunited distal radius fracture using an augmented reality (AR) osteotomy guide.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Mixed reality guidance in osteotomy provides superior precision and accuracy: validation and comparative study.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Enhancing the accuracy of genioplasty using mixed reality and computer-aided design/manufacturing: a randomized controlled trial.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- A Case of Application of Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Technology and Extended Reality Surgical Assistance to Marginal Mandibulectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Application of digital model of mixed reality dynamic tracking technique in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a basic research.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024Article
- Advanced outcomes of mixed reality usage in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the inflammatory parameters as potential biomarkers of systemic inflammation extent and the disease severity in psoriasis patients.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genioplasty is performed for the orthognathic surgical correction of dentofacial deformities. This article reports a safe and accurate method for genioplasty combining a novel three-dimensional (3D) device with mixed reality (MR)-assisted surgery using a registration marker and a head-mounted display. Four types of devices were designed based on the virtual operation: a surgical splint with a connector; an osteotomy device; a repositioning device; and a registration marker. Microsoft HoloLens 2 and Holoeyes MD were used to project holograms created using computed tomography (CT) data onto the surgical field to improve the accuracy of the computer-aided designed and manufactured (CAD/CAM) surgical guides. After making an incision on the oral vestibule, the splint was fitted on the teeth and the osteotomy device was mounted at the junction site, placed directly on the exposed mandible bone surface. Temporary screws were fixed into the screw hole. An ultrasonic cutting instrument was used for the osteotomy. After separating the bone, a repositioning device was connected to the splint junction and bone segment, and repositioning was performed. At the time of repositioning, the registration marker was connected to the splint junction, and mandible repositioning was confirmed three-dimensionally through HoloLens 2 into the position specified in the virtual surgery. The rate of overlay error between the preoperative virtual operation and one-month postoperative CT data within 2 mm was 100%. CAD/CAM combined with MR enabled accurate genioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.