Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068436›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Deep Learning in Coeliac Disease: A Systematic Review on Novel Diagnostic Approaches to Disease Diagnosis.

Kassem Sharif, Paula David, Mahmud Omar, Yousra Sharif, Yonatan Shneor Patt, Eyal Klang, Adi Lahat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The needle study: Machine learning as a new method for case-finding in celiac disease.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kassem SharifDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3905-3313
Paula DavidDepartment of Internal Medicine B, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-5895
Mahmud OmarFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID 0009-0001-0438-0827
Yousra SharifDepartment of Internal Medicine C, Haddasah Medical Centre, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel.
Yonatan Shneor PattDepartment of Internal Medicine B, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-1729
Eyal KlangFaculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Adi LahatDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1513-7280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoeliac disease affects approximately 1% of the global population with the diagnosis often relying on invasive and time-demanding methods. Deep learning, a powerful tool in medical science, shows potential for non-invasive, accurate coeliac disease diagnosis, though challenges remain.

objectiveThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the current state of deep-learning applications in coeliac disease diagnosis and identify potential areas for future research that could enhance diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. PRISMA guidelines were applied. Two independent reviewers identified research articles using deep learning for coeliac disease diagnosis and severity assessment. Only original research articles with performance metrics data were included. The quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, categorizing studies based on risk of bias and concerns about applicability. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted to describe the applications and efficacy of the deep-learning techniques (DLT) in coeliac disease diagnosis.

resultsThe initial search across four databases yielded 417 studies with 195 being removed due to duplicity. Finally, eight studies were found to be suitable for inclusion after rigorous evaluation. They were all published between 2017 and 2023 and focused on using DLT for coeliac disease diagnosis or assessing disease severity. Different deep-learning architectures were applied. Accuracy levels ranged from 84% to 95.94% with the GoogLeNet model achieving 100% sensitivity and specificity for video capsule endoscopy images.

conclusionsDLT hold substantial potential in coeliac disease diagnosis. They offer improved accuracy and the prospect of mitigating clinician bias. However, key challenges persist, notably the requirement for more extensive and diverse datasets, especially to detect milder forms of coeliac disease. These methods are in their nascent stages, underscoring the need of integrating multiple data sources to achieve comprehensive coeliac disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

coeliac diseasedeep learningdiagnosisinnovationmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38068436
PMCPMC10706988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.