Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068419›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Patient-Related Factors Predicting Stent Thrombosis in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Larisa Anghel, Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi, Andreea Tudurachi, Alexandra Zăvoi, Alexandra Clement, Alexandros Roungos, Laura-Cătălina Benchea, Ioana Mădălina Zota, Cristina Prisacariu, Radu Andy Sascău and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Repeated in-stent occlusion of RCA: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Larisa AnghelInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7925-3806
Bogdan-Sorin TudurachiInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7687-8624
Andreea TudurachiCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I. M. Georgescu", 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-6775-0287
Alexandra ZăvoiCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I. M. Georgescu", 700503 Iași, Romania.
Alexandra ClementInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Alexandros RoungosCardiology Department, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute "Prof. Dr. George I. M. Georgescu", 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0009-0006-8736-4094
Laura-Cătălina BencheaInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Ioana Mădălina ZotaInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Cristina PrisacariuInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Radu Andy SascăuInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.
Cristian StătescuInternal Medicine Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700503 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-4561
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInfectious Diseases Institute · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past four decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) safety and efficacy have significantly improved, particularly with the advent of the drug-eluting stent (DES). First-generation DESs reduced in-stent restenosis rates and targeted lesion revascularization; however, safety issues emerged, due to high incidences of stent thrombosis (ST) linked to death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Second-generation DESs were developed to overcome these issues, reducing late-thrombotic-event risk while maintaining anti-restenosis efficacy. Nevertheless, ST still occurs with second-generation DES use. Stent thrombosis etiology is multifaceted, encompassing lesion-, patient-, procedural-, and stent-related factors. Overall, most early-stent-thrombosis cases are linked to procedural and patient-related aspects. Factors like premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy, resistance to clopidogrel, smoking, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, reduced ejection fraction or undertaking coronary angioplasty for an acute coronary syndrome can increase the risk of stent thrombosis. The aim of this study is to assess patient-related factors that potentially heighten the risk of stent thrombosis, with the objective of pinpointing and addressing modifiable contributors to this risk. By focusing on both patient- and procedure-related factors, a multifaceted approach to coronary revascularization can help minimize complications and maximize long-term benefits in managing ST.

Indexed as

cardiac deathheart attackpatient-related factorspercutaneous coronary interventionstent thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID38068419
PMCPMC10707589
OpenAlexW4389085398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.