ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Evidence Quality Assessment.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Frontiers in Open and Minimally Invasive Abdominal Oncologic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary multivisceral resections involving the upper digestive tract: a United Kingdom tertiary cancer centre experience.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for T4b gastric cancer with transverse colon or mesentery invasion: a dual-center retrospective analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) regimen for T4b gastric cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Perioperative chemotherapy with nivolumab for HER2-negative locally advanced gastric cancer: a case series.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Analysis of Patient Outcomes following Curative R0 Multiorgan Resections for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) often require multivisceral resection (MVR) of the involved organs to achieve R0 resection and local disease control. The aim of the present study was to systematically review all available literature on the postoperative and long-term outcomes of MVR for gastric cancer. The PubMed database was systematically searched by two independent investigators for studies concerning MVR for LAGC. In total, 30 original studies with 3362 patients met our inclusion criteria. R0 resection was achieved in 67.77% (95% CI, 65.75-69.73%) of patients. The spleen, colon and pancreas comprised the most frequently resected organs in the context of MVR. Pancreatic fistulae (10.08%, 95% CI, 7.99-12.63%), intraabdominal abscesses (9.92%, 95% CI, 7.85-12.46%) and anastomotic leaks (8.09%, 95% CI, 6.23-10.45%) constituted the most common postoperative complications. Using the available data, we estimated the mean 1-year survival at 62.2%, 3-year survival at 33.05%, and 5-year survival at 30.21% for the entire cohort. The survival rates were mainly correlated with lymphatic invasion, tumor size and patient age. Therefore, gastrectomy, together with MVR, is feasible and may offer a survival advantage compared to gastrectomy alone or no other surgical treatment in a selected group of patients. Consequently, both patient and tumor characteristics should be carefully assessed to optimize candidate selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.