ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Development of Bleeding Artificial Intelligence Detector (BLAIR) System for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-based automated bleeding monitoring in conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence applications in surgical education and training: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Review
- The future of robotic surgery in the age of artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- The evolution of radical prostatectomy: a scoping review on surgical techniques and integration of surgeon-assisting concepts into the surgical workflow.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Accuracy and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Decision-Making: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Advances in the prevention and management of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.Hepatology international · 2025Review
- Classification of AO/OTA 31A/B femur fractures in X-ray images using YOLOv8 and advanced data augmentation techniques.Bone reports · 2024Article
- The Contemporary Role of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Recurrent Prostate Cancer: An Up-to-Date Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Review
- Revolutionary Advances of Robotic Surgery in Urology Field.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAddressing intraoperative bleeding remains a significant challenge in the field of robotic surgery. This research endeavors to pioneer a groundbreaking solution utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The objective is to establish a system capable of forecasting instances of intraoperative bleeding during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and promptly notify the surgeon about bleeding risks.
methodsTo achieve this, a multi-task learning (MTL) CNN was introduced, leveraging a modified version of the U-Net architecture. The aim was to categorize video input as either "absence of blood accumulation" (0) or "presence of blood accumulation" (1). To facilitate seamless interaction with the neural networks, the Bleeding Artificial Intelligence-based Detector (BLAIR) software was created using the Python Keras API and built upon the PyQT framework. A subsequent clinical assessment of BLAIR's efficacy was performed, comparing its bleeding identification performance against that of a urologist. Various perioperative variables were also gathered. For optimal MTL-CNN training parameterization, a multi-task loss function was adopted to enhance the accuracy of event detection by taking advantage of surgical tools' semantic segmentation. Additionally, the Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) approach was employed to assess software performance.
resultsThe MTL-CNN demonstrated a remarkable event recognition accuracy of 90.63%. When evaluating BLAIR's predictive ability and its capacity to pre-warn surgeons of potential bleeding incidents, the density plot highlighted a striking similarity between BLAIR and human assessments. In fact, BLAIR exhibited a faster response. Notably, the MCA analysis revealed no discernible distinction between the software and human performance in accurately identifying instances of bleeding.
conclusionThe BLAIR software proved its competence by achieving over 90% accuracy in predicting bleeding events during RARP. This accomplishment underscores the potential of AI to assist surgeons during interventions. This study exemplifies the positive impact AI applications can have on surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.