ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Patients at Risk for Transfusion-A Six-Year Multicentre Analysis of More Than 320,000 Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Missions.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for adverse incidents in patients during helicopter emergency medical services transports: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Helicopter versus GROUND emergency medical services in mountainous trauma care: a comparative cohort study on time efficiency, golden hour achievement, and clinical outcomes in the Qinba region.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a prehospital clinical prediction score for predicting massive blood transfusion in patients with trauma.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Pre-hospital assessment of trauma associated severe hemorrhage (phTASH) - analysis of TraumaRegister DGUScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: whole blood and plasma in prehospital hemorrhagic shock resuscitation.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
- [Prehospital blood transfusion : Opportunities and challenges for the German emergency medical services].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Europe, ambulances are increasingly being equipped with blood products for prehospital use. Available evidence on the early administration of blood products comes from military medicine and the Anglo-American medical literature; the evidence cannot be easily transferred to European countries.
objectivesThis study assesses the incidence of patients with massive haemorrhage after trauma and the potential need for prehospital blood transfusions.
methodsData reported by 37 German air rescue stations between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively analysed to predict the need for massive transfusion.
resultsA total of 320,347 helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) missions were performed and involved 2982 patients with potential need for massive transfusion after trauma (approximately 13 transfusions per helicopter per year). Men were most affected (73%). The median age of patients was 38 years. Traffic accidents accounted for 59% of the cases. Most patients sustained multiple injuries including traumatic brain injuries (62%), as well as thoracic (54%), abdominal (39%), and extremity injuries (41%). The median "rSIG" (reversed shock index multiplied with the Glasgow Coma Scale) decreased from 4.31 to 3.78.
conclusionsAlthough the incidence of haemorrhagic trauma patients is low, the prehospital administration of blood products might be useful as a potentially life-saving bridging treatment until hospital admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.