ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
MRI Assessment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Case Series.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative study of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and classification of cesarean scar pregnancy.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Management of an Advanced Low-Lying Implantation Disorder With Cervico-Isthmic Features at 29 Weeks of Gestation Presenting With PPROM: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Layered precision suturing vs. traditional double-layer closure at cesarean: a randomized trial of uterine scar healing and maternal outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Role of Interventional Radiology in Management of C-Section Scar Ectopics.Acta medica Lituanica · 2026Article
- Misdiagnosis analysis of uterine scar pregnancy after cesarean section.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Are the Risk Factors for Developing Type 1 and Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Different?Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs) are a type of ectopic pregnancy that occur when an embryo implants within the fibrous scar tissue of a previous cesarean surgery. If not promptly detected and treated, CSPs can result in serious maternal complications, such as uterine rupture and hemorrhage. TVUS (transvaginal ultrasonography) represents the imaging of choice for the diagnosis of CSPs; however, recent studies proposed a complementary role of MRI due to its capability in soft tissue characterization that may impact the therapeutical decision-making process. The purpose of our study was to explore the role of MRI in the diagnosis and its impact on therapeutical options in CSPs. Our experience showed that MRI has a complementary role to TVSU in correctly diagnosing CSPs, identifying the type, and guiding the therapeutical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.