Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068266›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Narrative Medicine: A Digital Diary in the Management of Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma-A Multidisciplinary Pilot Study.

Maria Cecilia Cercato, Concetta Elisa Onesti, Sabrina Vari, Gabriella Maggi, Wioletta Faltyn, Serena Ceddia, Irene Terrenato, Virginia Scarinci, Francesca Servoli, Cristina Cenci and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria Cecilia CercatoEpidemiology and Tumor Registry Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-6601
Concetta Elisa OnestiSarcomas and Rare Tumors Departmental Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8360-5026
Sabrina VariSarcomas and Rare Tumors Departmental Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6854-4771
Gabriella MaggiPsychology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Wioletta FaltynOrthopaedic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Serena CeddiaSarcomas and Rare Tumors Departmental Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Irene TerrenatoBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit-Scientific Direction, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0187-9323
Virginia ScarinciDigital Library 'R.Maceratini', IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-4279
Francesca ServoliDigital Library 'R.Maceratini', IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4448-9931
Cristina CenciDigital Narrative Medicine (DNM s.r.l.), 00161 Rome, Italy.
Roberto BiaginiOrthopaedic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Virginia FerraresiSarcomas and Rare Tumors Departmental Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.

Funding

Ricerca Corrente granted by the Italian Ministry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although patient narratives have been increasingly introduced in various fields of medicine, a standard method in clinical practice is still lacking. The objectives of this pilot study were to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of a digital narrative diary integrated into the care pathway of patients with bone sarcoma and limb soft tissue sarcoma both from the patients' and the healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perspectives. A digital platform, DNMLAB, was designed to obtain guided narratives from patients during their pathway of care in compliance with confidentiality and data protection laws. The diary was used for patients, often young, facing a rare and impactful disease that is difficult to manage and with few opportunities to share experiences. The multidisciplinary team shared the narratives and integrated them into the patient's treatment pathway. Narrative prompts were adequate for the care pathway. Patients correctly considered the diary as a shared area to think about their condition, and HCPs considered it "a shared area growing at each meeting with the patient". The main advantages reported by patients were increased awareness, the opportunity to express their opinion on cures and important personal needs and the perception of better taking charge (score ≥ 4.6). The main advantages of HCP were improved communication, therapeutic alliance, and deeper knowledge of patients. This study confirmed the authors' previous experiences, showing that a digital narrative process is feasible and useful for oncology clinical practice according to patients and HCPs.

Indexed as

bone sarcomadigital diarynarrative medicinesoft tissue sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID38068266
PMCPMC10706943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.