Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068259›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Effects of a Gait Training Program on Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Single-Group Prospective Cohort Study.

Alexander Echemendía Del Valle, Juan Enrique Bender Del Busto, Armando Sentmanat Belisón, Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar, Oliver Martínez-Pozas, Pedro Martínez-Lozano, Samuel Fernández-Carnero, Norberto Valcárcel Izquierdo, Eleuterio A Sánchez-Romero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander Echemendía Del ValleDepartment of Therapeutic and Prophylactic Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Havana 10600, Cuba.
Juan Enrique Bender Del BustoInternational Center for Neurological Restoration, Havana 11300, Cuba.
Armando Sentmanat BelisónDepartment of Therapeutic and Prophylactic Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Havana 10600, Cuba.
Juan Nicolás Cuenca-ZaldívarGrupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Oliver Martínez-PozasInterdisciplinary Research Group on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4804-550X
Pedro Martínez-LozanoInterdisciplinary Research Group on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2193-2101
Samuel Fernández-CarneroGrupo de Investigación en Fisioterapia y Dolor, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-1627
Norberto Valcárcel IzquierdoHigher Institute of Medical Sciences of Havana Victoria de Girón, University of Medical Sciences of Havana, Havana 11600, Cuba.
Eleuterio A Sánchez-RomeroInterdisciplinary Research Group on Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0254-6501
International Center of Neurologic Restoration · CUUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana · CUUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpinal cord injury is defined as the pathological process produced by any etiology affecting the spinal cord, which may alter motor, sensory, and/or autonomic function below the level of the lesion. The complexity of the neurological deficit and, therefore, the resulting clinical picture depends on the level of the lesion, the extent, and the affectation of the white or gray substance. This injury can totally or partially affect the ability to walk, and its highest priority with respect to mobility is to restore the ability to walk. All of which make the improvement of the methods used in their rehabilitation a top priority for health systems.

objectiveThe main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a gait training program for patients with spinal cord injuries. MATERIAL AND

methodsA single-group, prospective cohort study was developed following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Guidelines (STROBE) at the International Center for Neurological Restoration of Siboney Playa (Havana, Cuba) from May 2020 to July 2021 with a sample of 30 patients by accidental or deliberate non-probabilistic sampling that met the expected inclusion criteria, who underwent a physical rehabilitation program for 8 weeks of work.

resultsStatistically significant changes were observed in the overall course, by sex, by topographic level of lesion, and by functional class.

conclusionsThe gait training program used produced significant changes in thoracic spinal cord injured patients regardless of the level of injury, sex, or functional class of the patient.

Indexed as

gaitspinal cord injurytraining

Identifiers

PMID38068259
PMCPMC10707500
OpenAlexW4388857173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.