Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38068089›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Critical Review of Comparative Study of Selective Laser Melting and Investment Casting for Thin-Walled Parts.

Naol Dessalegn Dejene, Hirpa G Lemu, Endalkachew Mosisa Gutema

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Two-Staged Technology for CoCr Stent Production by SLM.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naol Dessalegn DejeneDepartment of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5949-8243
Hirpa G LemuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering &Technology, Wallaga University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-9588-4707
Endalkachew Mosisa GutemaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering &Technology, Wallaga University, Nekemte P.O. Box 395, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-7216

Funding

This research was supported by the INDMET project funded by the NORHED II program Grant number 62862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thin-walled structures are a significant and growing portion of engineering construction, with a wide range of applications, including storage vessels, industrial buildings, warehouses, aircraft, automobiles, bridges, ships, and oil rigs. Thin-walled components with minimum thickness without compromising strength and other quality characteristics are the desire of modern industry. Reducing wall thickness not only aids in lowering the cost of production. It also improves the effectiveness of engineering systems, resulting in lower fuel consumption and lower emissions of hazardous gases to the environment. Nowadays, even though thin-walled parts are demanded, the constraints of the production process, quality, and reliability are the concerns of current research and development. The ability to produce parts with intricate geometries and tight dimensional tolerances are important criteria for advanced manufacturing processes. In the early days of society, investment casting was used to produce jewelry, weapons, and statues. In modern industry, investment casting is still used to produce thin-walled and intricate parts such as turbine blades. The current advancements in SLM, which has the capacity to produce thin-walled and intricate parts, have recently attracted attention due to several benefits, such as the supreme degree of design freedom and the viability of tool-free production directly from CAD data. However, the current technological applications of SLM and investment casting are crucial for producing parts at the desired quality and reliability. This review article focuses on comparative studies of SLM and investment casting at the current technology level. The basis of comparison via systematic approach is mechanical characterization; quality in terms of porosity, microstructure, surface roughness and dimensional accuracy; and residual stress. Therefore, the latest open scientific sources published are considered to obtain sufficient literature coverage. Better tensile strength and fine microstructure are found in SLM, while better surface quality, fatigue load resistance, ductility, and residual stress are found in investment casting. The research gap for further investigation is indicated.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingcastingdimensional accuracyinvestment castingmicrostructureporosityresidual stressroughnessselective laser meltingthin-walled

Identifiers

PMID38068089
PMCPMC10707632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.