ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Explainable AI for Material Property Prediction Based on Energy Cloud: A Shapley-Driven Approach.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generating and leveraging explanations of AI/ML models in materials and manufacturing research.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Deep learning to estimate response of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small-cell lung carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scientific community has raised increasing apprehensions over the transparency and interpretability of machine learning models employed in various domains, particularly in the field of materials science. The intrinsic intricacy of these models frequently results in their characterization as "black boxes", which poses a difficulty in emphasizing the significance of producing lucid and readily understandable model outputs. In addition, the assessment of model performance requires careful deliberation of several essential factors. The objective of this study is to utilize a deep learning framework called TabNet to predict lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ceramics' dielectric constant property by employing their components and processes. By recognizing the crucial importance of predicting PZT properties, this research seeks to enhance the comprehension of the results generated by the model and gain insights into the association between the model and predictor variables using various input parameters. To achieve this, we undertake a thorough analysis with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). In order to enhance the reliability of the prediction model, a variety of cross-validation procedures are utilized. The study demonstrates that the TabNet model significantly outperforms traditional machine learning models in predicting ceramic characteristics of PZT components, achieving a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.047 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.042. Key contributing factors, such as d33, tangent loss, and chemical formula, are identified using SHAP plots, highlighting their importance in predictive analysis. Interestingly, process time is less effective in predicting the dielectric constant. This research holds considerable potential for advancing materials discovery and predictive systems in PZT ceramics, offering deep insights into the roles of various parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.