Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067961›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Classification of Targets and Distractors in an Audiovisual Attention Task Based on Electroencephalography.

Steven Mortier, Renata Turkeš, Jorg De Winne, Wannes Van Ransbeeck, Dick Botteldooren, Paul Devos, Steven Latré, Marc Leman, Tim Verdonck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven MortierIDLab-Department of Computer Science, University of Antwerp-imec, Sint-Pietersvliet 7, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-6656
Renata TurkešIDLab-Department of Computer Science, University of Antwerp-imec, Sint-Pietersvliet 7, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9472-1698
Jorg De WinneWAVES Research Group, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, 4 Technologiepark 126, Zwijnaarde, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5253-7174
Wannes Van RansbeeckWAVES Research Group, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, 4 Technologiepark 126, Zwijnaarde, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-8299
Dick BotteldoorenWAVES Research Group, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, 4 Technologiepark 126, Zwijnaarde, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-7238
Paul DevosWAVES Research Group, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University, 4 Technologiepark 126, Zwijnaarde, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4940-8886
Steven LatréIDLab-Department of Computer Science, University of Antwerp-imec, Sint-Pietersvliet 7, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0351-1714
Marc LemanDepartment of Art, Music and Theater Studies, Institute for Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music (IPEM), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9780-2194
Tim VerdonckDepartment of Mathematics, University of Antwerp-imec, Middelheimlaan 1, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1105-2028

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders G0A0220N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the broader context of improving interactions between artificial intelligence and humans, the question has arisen regarding whether auditory and rhythmic support could increase attention for visual stimuli that do not stand out clearly from an information stream. To this end, we designed an experiment inspired by pip-and-pop but more appropriate for eliciting attention and P3a-event-related potentials (ERPs). In this study, the aim was to distinguish between targets and distractors based on the subject's electroencephalography (EEG) data. We achieved this objective by employing different machine learning (ML) methods for both individual-subject (IS) and cross-subject (CS) models. Finally, we investigated which EEG channels and time points were used by the model to make its predictions using saliency maps. We were able to successfully perform the aforementioned classification task for both the IS and CS scenarios, reaching classification accuracies up to 76%. In accordance with the literature, the model primarily used the parietal-occipital electrodes between 200 ms and 300 ms after the stimulus to make its prediction. The findings from this research contribute to the development of more effective P300-based brain-computer interfaces. Furthermore, they validate the EEG data collected in our experiment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceElectroencephalographyAcoustic StimulationAttentionEvent-Related Potentials, P300Evoked PotentialsHumansclassificationelectroencephalographyevent-related potentialmachine learningP300

Identifiers

PMID38067961
PMCPMC10708631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.