Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067912›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Fast Nonlinear Predictive Control Using Classical and Parallel Wiener Models: A Comparison for a Neutralization Reactor Process.

Robert Nebeluk, Maciej Ławryńczuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert NebelukInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1152-8690
Maciej ŁawryńczukInstitute of Control and Computation Engineering, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6846-2004

Funding

Warsaw University of Technology in the framework of the project for the scientific discipline automatic control, electronics and electrical engineering
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Wiener model, composed of a linear dynamical block and a nonlinear static one connected in series, is frequently used for prediction in Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithms. The parallel structure is an extension of the classical Wiener model; it is expected to offer better modeling accuracy and increase the MPC control quality. This work discusses the benefits of using the parallel Wiener model in MPC. It has three objectives. Firstly, it describes a fast MPC algorithm in which parallel Wiener models are used for online prediction. In the presented approach, sophisticated trajectory linearization is performed online, which leads to computationally fast quadratic optimization. The second objective of this work is to study the influence of the model structure on modeling accuracy. The well-known neutralization benchmark process is considered. It is shown that the parallel Wiener models in the open-loop mode generate significantly fewer errors than the classical structure. This work's third objective is to validate the efficiency of parallel Wiener models in closed-loop MPC. For the neutralization process, it is demonstrated that parallel models demonstrate better control quality using various indicators, but the difference between the classical and parallel models is not significant.

Indexed as

model predictive controlneutralization reactorwiener models

Identifiers

PMID38067912
PMCPMC10708846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.