Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067866›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Predicting Tacit Coordination Success Using Electroencephalogram Trajectories: The Impact of Task Difficulty.

Dor Mizrahi, Ilan Laufer, Inon Zuckerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dor MizrahiDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel 4070000, Israel.
Ilan LauferDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel 4070000, Israel.
Inon ZuckermanDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ariel University, Ariel 4070000, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-1750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we aim to develop a machine learning model to predict the level of coordination between two players in tacit coordination games by analyzing the similarity of their spatial EEG features. We present an analysis, demonstrating the model's sensitivity, which was assessed through three conventional measures (precision, recall, and f1 score) based on the EEG patterns. These measures are evaluated in relation to the coordination task difficulty, as determined by the coordination index (CI). Tacit coordination games are games in which two individuals are requested to select the same option out of a closed set without the ability to communicate. This study aims to examine the effect of the difficulty of a semantic coordination task on the ability to predict a successful coordination between two players based on the compatibility between their EEG signals. The difficulty of each of the coordination tasks was estimated based on the degree of dispersion of the different answers given by the players reflected by the CI. The classification of the spatial distance between each pair of individual brain patterns, analyzed using the random walk algorithm, was used to predict whether successful coordination occurred or not. The classification performance was obtained for each game individually, i.e., for each different complexity level, via recall and precision indices. The results showed that the classifier performance depended on the CI, that is, on the level of coordination difficulty. These results, along with possibilities for future research, are discussed.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMachine LearningAlgorithmsBrainHumansSemanticsanonymous random walksEEGgraph embeddingstacit coordinationtrajectories

Identifiers

PMID38067866
PMCPMC10708720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.