Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067479›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Design of Experiments for Optimizing Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant-Based Sources.

Luis Miguel Anaya-Esparza, Edward F Aurora-Vigo, Zuamí Villagrán, Ernesto Rodríguez-Lafitte, José Martín Ruvalcaba-Gómez, Miguel Ángel Solano-Cornejo, Victor Manuel Zamora-Gasga, Efigenia Montalvo-González, Horacio Gómez-Rodríguez, César Eduardo Aceves-Aldrete and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bioinputs fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luis Miguel Anaya-EsparzaCentro Universitario de los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47620, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9194-1719
Edward F Aurora-VigoEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Zuamí VillagránCentro Universitario de los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47620, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9871-5407
Ernesto Rodríguez-LafitteEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
José Martín Ruvalcaba-GómezCentro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47600, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8124-6410
Miguel Ángel Solano-CornejoEscuela de Ingeniería Agroindustrial y Comercio Exterior, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Victor Manuel Zamora-GasgaLaboratorio Integral de Investigación en Alimentos, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Tepic 63175, Mexico.
Efigenia Montalvo-GonzálezLaboratorio Integral de Investigación en Alimentos, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Tepic 63175, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-0806
Horacio Gómez-RodríguezCentro Universitario de los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47620, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0300-1749
César Eduardo Aceves-AldreteCentro Universitario de los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47620, Mexico.
Napoleón González-SilvaCentro Universitario de los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos 47620, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6326-6752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-based materials are an important source of bioactive compounds (BC) with interesting industrial applications. Therefore, adequate experimental strategies for maximizing their recovery yield are required. Among all procedures for extracting BC (maceration, Soxhlet, hydro-distillation, pulsed-electric field, enzyme, microwave, high hydrostatic pressure, and supercritical fluids), the ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) highlighted as an advanced, cost-efficient, eco-friendly, and sustainable alternative for recovering BC (polyphenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and carotenoids) from plant sources with higher yields. However, the UAE efficiency is influenced by several factors, including operational variables and extraction process (frequency, amplitude, ultrasonic power, pulse cycle, type of solvent, extraction time, solvent-to-solid ratio, pH, particle size, and temperature) that exert an impact on the molecular structures of targeted molecules, leading to variations in their biological properties. In this context, a diverse design of experiments (DOEs), including full or fractional factorial, Plackett-Burman, Box-Behnken, Central composite, Taguchi, Mixture, D-optimal, and Doehlert have been investigated alone and in combination to optimize the UAE of BC from plant-based materials, using the response surface methodology and mathematical models in a simple or multi-factorial/multi-response approach. The present review summarizes the advantages and limitations of the most common DOEs investigated to optimize the UAE of bioactive compounds from plant-based materials.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninsPolyphenolsFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsSolventsAnthocyaninsFlavonoidsPlant ExtractsPolyphenolsSolventsdesirability functionDOEgreen extractionmathematical modelsphenolic compoundsphytochemicalsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38067479
PMCPMC10707804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.