Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067452›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparative Analysis of the Metabolic Profiles of Strains of

Li Li, Changyao Shan, Qun Liu, Baishu Li, Tao Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li LiInstitute of Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, No. A3 Gaobeidianbeilu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Changyao ShanInstitute of Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, No. A3 Gaobeidianbeilu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100123, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6241-6798
Qun LiuInstitute of Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, No. A3 Gaobeidianbeilu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Baishu LiInstitute of Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, No. A3 Gaobeidianbeilu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Tao LiuInstitute of Equipment Technology, Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, No. A3 Gaobeidianbeilu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100123, China.
Chinese Academy of Inspection and Quarantine · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation NO. 6212032Postharvest control of biological contaminants of State Administration for Market Regulation NO. 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of phosphine (PH3) resistance in stored grain pests is an essential component of implementing timely and effective pest control strategies. The prevailing standard method for PH3 resistance testing involves the exposure of adult insects to a specific concentration over a fixed period. Although it is widely adopted, this method necessitates an extensive period for assay preparation and diagnosis. To address this issue, this study employed Direct Immersion Solid-Phase Microextraction (DI-SPME) coupled with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) to compare and analyze the metabolic profiles of PH3-sensitive (TC-S), PH3 weak-resistant (TC-W), and PH3 strong-resistant (TC-SR)

Indexed as

InsecticidesTriboliumAnimalsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHydrocarbonsImmersionInsecticide ResistanceMetabolomePhosphinesSolid Phase MicroextractionHydrocarbonsInsecticidesphosphinePhosphinesDI-SPME-GC-MSmetabolitespest managementPH3 resistance detectionTribolium castaneum (Herbst)

Identifiers

PMID38067452
PMCPMC10707947
OpenAlexW4388928920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.