Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067408›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Predictive Factors for Chemoradiation-Induced Oral Mucositis and Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review.

Alexander J Nicol, Jerry C F Ching, Victor C W Tam, Kelvin C K Liu, Vincent W S Leung, Jing Cai, Shara W Y Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of mid-treatmentQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Genetic associations of LXN polymorphisms with toxicities of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Effectiveness ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alexander J NicolDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1633-1133
Jerry C F ChingDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1704-4061
Victor C W TamDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Kelvin C K LiuDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Vincent W S LeungDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-0920
Jing CaiDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6934-0108
Shara W Y LeeDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-2076
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

Project of Strategic Importance Fund P0035421Projects of RISA (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) P0043001Shenzhen Basic Research Program JCYJ20210324130209023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in head and neck cancer treatment, virtually all patients experience chemoradiation-induced toxicities. Oral mucositis (OM) and dysphagia are among the most prevalent and have a systemic impact on patients, hampering treatment outcome and harming quality of life. Accurate prediction of severe cases is crucial for improving management strategies and, ultimately, patient outcomes. This scoping review comprehensively maps the reported predictors and critically evaluates the performance, methodology, and reporting of predictive models for these conditions. A total of 174 studies were identified from database searches, with 73 reporting OM predictors, 97 reporting dysphagia predictors, and 4 reporting both OM and dysphagia predictors. These predictors included patient demographics, tumor classification, chemoradiotherapy regimen, radiation dose to organs-at-risk, genetic factors, and results of clinical laboratory tests. Notably, many studies only conducted univariate analysis or focused exclusively on certain predictor types. Among the included studies, numerous predictive models were reported: eight for acute OM, five for acute dysphagia, and nine for late dysphagia. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranged between 0.65 and 0.81, 0.60 and 0.82, and 0.70 and 0.85 for acute oral mucositis, acute dysphagia, and late dysphagia predictive models, respectively. Several areas for improvement were identified, including the need for external validation with sufficiently large sample sizes, further standardization of predictor and outcome definitions, and more comprehensive reporting to facilitate reproducibility.

Indexed as

acute toxicitydysphagiahead and neck cancerlate toxicityoral mucositispredictive factors

Identifiers

PMID38067408
PMCPMC10705154
OpenAlexW4389305965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.