ArticleCancers2023
Shifting Epidemiology Trends in Tongue Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI-Based Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Prediction of Recurrence and Prognostic Outcomes in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Functional Meta-Synthesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis and Depth of Invasion in Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antitumor Effects of Apatinib on Tongue Cancer in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Rising Incidence of Tongue Cancer Surgeries Among Middle-Aged and Older Women in Japan: A Nationwide Claims-Based Analysis From 2014 to 2022.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of Salivary Microbiota in Japanese Patients with Oral Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tongue is the most common site for oral cavity carcinoma. It typically has male predominance. However, several studies have documented an increasing number of incidences among the younger population, with female predominance, which is unusual. In this study, we aimed to determine current trends in tongue cancer regarding age and gender. Data from 197 tongue cancer patients were extracted from The Oncology Center, Mansoura University (OCMU) database from 2006 to 2021. The patients were divided into two time periods: (2006-2013) and (2014-2021). We computed counts and proportions of tongue cancer for demographic and tumor characteristics. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Gender showed no statistically significant difference in both groups, while the percentages of diagnosed females were 52.7% and 52%, respectively. The percentages of males were 47.3% and 48%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.