ArticleCancers2023
Radiomics and Clinicopathological Characteristics for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Testicular Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Testis to Retroperitoneum: The Role of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Primary Tumors and Nodal Disease in Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- From incidentaloma to actionable insight: a clinical-molecular-imaging framework for risk-stratified management of testicular microlithiasis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Four overlooked errors in ROC analysis: how to prevent and avoid.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- Radiological Assessment of Different Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Measurements in Stage 1 Testicular Cancer Patients: Impact on Clinical Stage and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Radiomics analysis based on CT for predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis in duodenal papillary carcinoma.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with testicular cancer is highly relevant for treatment decision-making and prognostic evaluation. Our study aimed to develop and validate clinical radiomics models for individual preoperative prediction of LNM in patients with testicular cancer. We enrolled 91 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed early-stage testicular cancer, with disease confined to the testes. We included five significant clinical risk factors (age, preoperative serum tumour markers AFP and B-HCG, histotype and BMI) to build the clinical model. After segmenting 273 retroperitoneal lymph nodes, we then combined the clinical risk factors and lymph node radiomics features to establish combined predictive models using Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), Support Vector Machine Classifier (SVC), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN). Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Finally, the decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical usefulness. The Random Forest combined clinical lymph node radiomics model with the highest AUC of 0.95 (±0.03 SD; 95% CI) was considered the candidate model with decision curve analysis, demonstrating its usefulness for preoperative prediction in the clinical setting. Our study has identified reliable and predictive machine learning techniques for predicting lymph node metastasis in early-stage testicular cancer. Identifying the most effective machine learning approaches for predictive analysis based on radiomics integrating clinical risk factors can expand the applicability of radiomics in precision oncology and cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.