Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067250›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

More than Five Decades of Proton Therapy: A Bibliometric Overview of the Scientific Literature.

Maria Giulia Vincini, Mattia Zaffaroni, Marco Schwarz, Giulia Marvaso, Federico Mastroleo, Stefania Volpe, Luca Bergamaschi, Giovanni Carlo Mazzola, Giulia Corrao, Roberto Orecchia and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proton therapy in Spain: SEOR-SPROMP multidisciplinary recommendations developed through a RAND/UCLA consensus process.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Giulia VinciniDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-3149
Mattia ZaffaroniDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-4634
Marco SchwarzRadiation Oncology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6964-7732
Giulia MarvasoDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5339-8038
Federico MastroleoDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6580-6767
Stefania VolpeDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Luca BergamaschiDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Giovanni Carlo MazzolaDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0865-0134
Giulia CorraoDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5757-6073
Roberto OrecchiaScientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-FossaDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Daniela AlterioDivision of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe therapeutic potential of proton therapy (PT) was first recognized in 1946 by Robert Wilson, and nowadays, over 100 proton centers are in operation worldwide, and more than 60 are under construction or planned. Bibliometric data can be used to perform a structured analysis of large amounts of scientific data to provide new insights, e.g., to assess the growth and development of the field and to identify research trends and hot topics. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the current status and trends in scientific literature in the PT field.

methodsThe literature on PT until the 31st December 2022 in the Scopus database was searched, including the following keywords:

resultsA total of 7335 documents, mainly articles (n = 4794, 65%) and reviews (n = 1527, 21%), were collected from 1946 to 2022 from 1054 sources and 21,696 authors. Of these, roughly 84% (n = 6167) were produced in the last 15 years (2008-2022), in which the mean annual growth rate was 13%. Considering the corresponding author's country, 79 countries contributed to the literature; the USA was the top contributor, with 2765 (38%) documents, of whom 84% were single-country publications (SCP), followed by Germany and Japan, with 535 and 531 documents of whom 66% and 93% were SCP. Considering the themes subanalysis (2002-2022), a total of 7192 documents were analyzed; among all keywords used by authors, the top three were radiotherapy (n = 1394, 21% of documents), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (n = 301, 5%), and prostate cancer (n = 301, 5%). Among disease types, prostate cancer is followed by chordoma, head and neck, and breast cancer. The change in trend themes demonstrated the fast evolution of hotspots in PT; among the most recent trends, the appearance of flash, radiomics,

conclusionsThe results of the present bibliometric analysis showed that PT is an active and rapidly increasing field of research. Themes of the published works encompass the main aspects of its application in clinical practice, such as the comparison with the actual photon-based standard of care technique and the continuing technological advances. This analysis gives an overview of past scientific production and, most importantly, provides a useful point of view on the future directions of the research activities.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisbibliometricsproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID38067250
PMCPMC10705139
OpenAlexW4388944786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.