Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067249›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Single Dose of PEG-Asparaginase at the Beginning of Induction Not Only Accelerates MRD Clearance but Also Improves Long-Term Outcome in Children with B-Lineage ALL.

Alexander Popov, Günter Henze, Julia Roumiantseva, Oleh Bydanov, Mikhail Belevtsev, Tatiana Verzhbitskaya, Liudmila Movchan, Grigory Tsaur, Svetlana Lagoyko, Liudmila Zharikova and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander PopovDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-6986
Günter HenzeDepartment of Pediatric Oncology Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Julia RoumiantsevaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Oleh BydanovDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Mikhail BelevtsevBelarussian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, 223053 Minsk, Belarus.
Tatiana VerzhbitskayaRegional Children's Hospital, Ekaterinburg 620149, Russia.
Liudmila MovchanBelarussian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, 223053 Minsk, Belarus.
Grigory TsaurRegional Children's Hospital, Ekaterinburg 620149, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9881-6221
Svetlana LagoykoDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-104X
Liudmila ZharikovaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Natalia MyakovaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Dmitry LitvinovDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Olga KhlebnikovaRegional Children's Hospital, Ekaterinburg 620149, Russia.
Olga StrenevaRegional Children's Hospital, Ekaterinburg 620149, Russia.
Elena StolyarovaBelarussian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, 223053 Minsk, Belarus.
Natalia PonomarevaRepublican Children's Hospital, Moscow 594268, Russia.
Galina NovichkovaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Larisa FechinaRegional Children's Hospital, Ekaterinburg 620149, Russia.
Olga AleinikovaDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Alexander KarachunskiyDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, 1, S. Mashela St., Moscow 117998, Russia.
Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology · RUInstitute of Medical Cell Technologies · RUBelarusian Research Center For Pediatric Oncology and Hematology · BYCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DERegional Children's Clinical Hospital No. 1 · RURussian Children's Clinical Hospital · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report presents the results of the assessment of MRD response by multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) with regard to the randomized use of pegylated asparaginase (PEG). In this study, PEG was randomly administered at a dose of 1000 U/m

methodsConventional induction therapy consisted of dexamethasone, vincristine, and daunorubicin. MRD data was available in 502 patients who were randomized at the start of induction therapy, standard-risk (SR) patients into three (conventional induction without PEG, induction with additional PEG and with PEG but without daunorubicin) and intermediate-risk (ImR) patients into two groups (with additional PEG and without PEG).

resultsThe single administration of PEG resulted in a significantly higher proportion of rapid responders, in SR patients even when no anthracyclines were used for induction. In the SR group, the event-free survival of the MFC-MRD fast responders was similar in the PEG- and PEG+ arms (92.0 ± 3.1% vs. 96.2 ± 1.5%, respectively), and the same unfavorable trend was observed for MFC-MRD slow responders (57.5 ± 12.3% vs. 66.7 ± 15.7%, respectively). Results were similar in ImR patients: (94.3 ± 3.2% vs. 95.1 ± 2.4%, for fast responders and 63.3 ± 7.6% vs. 78.1 ± 7.9%, for slow responders in PEG- and PEG+ arms, respectively). However, there is a large difference between the proportion of MFC-MRD slow responders in the PEG- and PEG+ groups (18.3% vs. 5.2% for the SR group and 44.2% vs. 25.0% for the ImR group).

conclusionsTherefore, early use of PEG-ASP not only leads to an accelerated reduction of blasts, but also to an excellent outcome in a significantly larger proportion of patients in both risk groups.

Indexed as

acute lymphoblastic leukemiaflow cytometryminimal residual diseasePEG-asparaginase

Identifiers

PMID38067249
PMCPMC10705323
OpenAlexW4388944792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.