Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067230›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Exploring the In Vitro and In Vivo Therapeutic Potential of BRAF and MEK Inhibitor Combination in NRAS-Mutated Melanoma.

Heike Niessner, Anna Hüsch, Corinna Kosnopfel, Matthias Meinhardt, Dana Westphal, Friedegund Meier, Bastian Schilling, Tobias Sinnberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heike NiessnerDivision of Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2542-7022
Anna HüschDivision of Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Corinna KosnopfelDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0910-838X
Matthias MeinhardtDepartment of Pathology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Dana WestphalNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-0402
Friedegund MeierNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Bastian SchillingDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8859-4103
Tobias SinnbergDivision of Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3922-3327

Funding

Pierre Fabre N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with NRAS-mutant metastatic melanoma often have an aggressive disease requiring a fast-acting, effective therapy. The MEK inhibitor binimetinib shows an overall response rate of 15% in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma, providing a backbone for combination strategies. Our previous studies demonstrated that in NRAS-mutant melanoma, the antitumor activity of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib was significantly potentiated by the BRAFV600E/K inhibitor encorafenib through the induction of ER stress, leading to melanoma cell death by apoptotic mechanisms. Encorafenib combined with binimetinib was well tolerated in a phase III trial showing potent antitumor activity in BRAF-mutant melanoma, making a rapid evaluation in NRAS-mutant melanoma imminently feasible. These data provide a mechanistic rationale for the evaluation of binimetinib combined with encorafenib in preclinical and clinical studies on NRAS-mutant metastatic melanoma.

methodsThe combination of BRAFi plus MEKi was tested in a monolayer culture of patient-derived cell lines and in corresponding patient-derived tissue slice cultures of NRAS-mutant melanoma. To investigate the treatment in vivo, NSG (NOD. Cg-

resultsEncorafenib was able to enhance the inhibitory effect on cell growth of binimetinib only in the cell line SKMel147 in vitro. It failed to enhance the apoptotic effect found in two other NRAS-mutated cell lines. Encorafenib led to a hyperactivation of ERK which could be reduced with the combinational treatment. In two of the three patient-derived tissue slice culture models of NRAS-mutant melanomas, a slight tendency of a combinatorial effect was seen which was not significant. Encorafenib showed a slight induction of the ER stress genes

conclusionIn in vitro and ex vivo settings, the combination therapy was observed to elicit a response; however, it did not amplify the efficacy observed with binimetinib alone, whereas in a patient, the combinational treatment remained ineffective. The preclinical in vivo data showed no increased combinatorial effect. However, the in vivo effect of binimetinib as monotherapy was unexpectedly high in the tested regimen. Nevertheless, binimetinib proved to be advantageous in the treatment of melanoma in vivo and led to high rates of apoptosis in vitro; hence, it still seems to be a good base for combination with other substances in the treatment of patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Indexed as

binimetinibBRAF inhibitorcancerencorafenibmalignant melanomaNRAS-mutatedPDX (patient-derived xenograft) mouse model

Identifiers

PMID38067230
PMCPMC10705743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.