Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067208›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Future Perspectives in the Second Line Therapeutic Setting for Non-Oncogene Addicted Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Marco Siringo, Javier Baena, Helena Bote de Cabo, Javier Torres-Jiménez, María Zurera, Jon Zugazagoitia, Luis Paz-Ares

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TONSL promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression, immune escape and drug sensitivity.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CD4Oncoimmunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco SiringoDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0489-1790
Javier BaenaDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-8498
Helena Bote de CaboDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Javier Torres-JiménezDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
María ZureraDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Jon ZugazagoitiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Luis Paz-AresDepartment of Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre Hospital, 28041 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Blocking the anti-PD-1 axis represents the current standard of care in the first-line setting, with drugs administered either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Despite notable successes achieved with ICIs, most of their long-term benefits are restricted to approximately 20% of patients. Consequently, the post-failure treatment landscape after failure to first-line treatment remains a complex challenge. Currently, docetaxel remains the preferred option, although its benefits remain modest as most patients do not respond or progress promptly. In recent times, novel agents and treatment combinations have emerged, offering fresh opportunities to improve patient outcomes. ICIs combined either with antiangiogenic or other novel immunotherapeutic compounds have shown promising preliminary activity. However, more mature data concerning specific combinations do not support their benefit over standard of care. In addition, antibody-drug conjugates seem to be the most promising alternative among all available compounds according to already-published phase I/II data that will be confirmed in soon-to-be-published phase III trial data. In this report, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current second-line treatment options and discuss future therapeutic perspectives.

Indexed as

antibody–drug conjugatesimmunotherapy combinationssecond line NSCLC

Identifiers

PMID38067208
PMCPMC10705719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.