Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38067081›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Beta-Carotene Supplementation for Sows: Reproductive Parameters and Productive Performance of Piglets.

Amanda Medeiros Araújo de Oliveira, Ednardo Rodrigues Freitas, Denise Batista Nogueira, Gabriel Gobira de Alcântara Araújo, Lucas Melo de Silva, Eduardo Afonso Frandi Butolo, Kassia Moreira Santos, Maurício Frias Prata, Claudia Cassimira da Silva Martins, Adsos Adami Passos and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Medeiros Araújo de OliveiraDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.
Ednardo Rodrigues FreitasDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.
Denise Batista NogueiraDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-070, Brazil.
Gabriel Gobira de Alcântara AraújoTopigs Norsvin, Curitiba 80420-210, Brazil.
Lucas Melo de SilvaDepartamento de Ciências Animais, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró 59625-900, Brazil.
Eduardo Afonso Frandi ButoloIntegral Mix, Fortaleza 60831-745, Brazil.
Kassia Moreira SantosDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.
Maurício Frias PrataDSM Nutritional Product, São Paulo 05321-010, Brazil.
Claudia Cassimira da Silva MartinsDSM Nutritional Product, São Paulo 05321-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3822-5611
Adsos Adami PassosDSM Nutritional Product, São Paulo 05321-010, Brazil.
Carlos LozanoDSM Nutritional Product, São Paulo 05321-010, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1615-6758
Leonardo Augusto Fonseca PascoalDepartamento de Ciência Animal, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Areia 58397-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-5251
Pedro Henrique WatanabeDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza 60020-181, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade de Fortaleza · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid fetal development and the increased demand for milk result in a catabolic state and oxidative stress in hyperprolific sows. Despite animal defense mechanisms, the dietary supplementation of antioxidants is being evaluated to reduce the impacts of excess free radicals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of beta-carotene supplementation for sows on the reproductive response and performance of suckling piglets. A total of 120 sows were distributed in a 3 × 4 factorial arrangement of three supplementation levels (B0-no supplementation, B200-200 mg beta-carotene/day and B400-400 mg beta-carotene/day) and four groups of parity order (1st, 2nd, 3rd, above 4th). Beta-carotene supplementation during lactation resulted in a higher litter weight at weaning. A higher average weight of piglets and litter weight at birth were observed, as well as a greater number of piglets weaned and litter weight at weaning in sows supplemented with 400 mg of beta-carotene during gestation and lactation periods. Supplementation with 200 and 400 mg of beta-carotene resulted in a greater weight at weaning and daily weight gain in piglets. Daily supplementation with 400 mg of beta-carotene in the prepartum and lactation phases provides a greater litter weight at weaning and, when supplemented in the pre-gestation and gestation periods, results in a greater litter weight at birth and at weaning.

Indexed as

antioxidantcarotenoidhyper-prolificitypigmentpro-vitaminvitamin

Identifiers

PMID38067081
PMCPMC10705737
OpenAlexW4389221509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.