Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066960›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Genomic Selection Using Single-Step Genomic BLUP on the Number of Services per Conception Trait in Thai-Holstein Crossbreeds.

Wuttigrai Boonkum, Vibuntita Chankitisakul, Monchai Duangjinda, Sayan Buaban, Pattarapol Sumreddee, Piriyaporn Sungkhapreecha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wuttigrai BoonkumDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kean University, Khon Kean 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-2300
Vibuntita ChankitisakulDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kean University, Khon Kean 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3619-8680
Monchai DuangjindaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kean University, Khon Kean 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-8271
Sayan BuabanBureau of Animal Husbandry and Genetic Improvement, Department of Livestock Development, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Pattarapol SumreddeeBureau of Biotechnology in Livestock Production, Department of Livestock Development, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
Piriyaporn SungkhapreechaDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Pathum Thani 12110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8184-9326

Funding

Agricultural research development agency (public organization) PRP5705010220.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive traits are important traits that directly affect a farmer's income and are difficult to improve upon using traditional genetic methods. Therefore, there is a need to consider new options for increasing the accuracy of the genetic selection of dairy cows. The objective of this study was to compare the genetic methods of the traditional BLUP and ssGBLUP techniques in terms of the estimated genetic parameters and accuracy of the estimated breeding values. The data comprised 101,331 services per conception (NSPC) records from 54,027 Thai-Holstein crossbred cows, 109,233 pedigree data, and 770 genotyped animals. A Bayesian analysis via threshold Gibbs sampling was used to analyze the estimated variance components and genetic parameters. The results showed that the means of the NSPC data were 2.21, 2.31, and 2.42 for less than 87.5% for Holstein genetics (breed group; BG1), 87.5 to 93.6% for Holstein genetics (BG2), and greater than 93.7% for Holstein genetics (BG3), respectively. The estimated heritability values were 0.038 and 0.051, and the repeatability values were 0.149 and 0.157 for the traditional BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, respectively. The accuracy of the estimated breeding values from the ssGBLUP method was higher than that from the traditional BLUP method, ranging from 6.05 to 17.69%, depending on the dataset, especially in the top 20% of the bull dataset had the highest values. In conclusion, the ssGBLUP method could improve the heritability value and accuracy of the breeding values compared with the traditional BLUP method. Therefore, switching from traditional methods to the ssGBLUP method for the Thai dairy cattle breeding program is a viable option.

Indexed as

accuracyfertilityssGBLUPThai dairy cattletropical area

Identifiers

PMID38066960
PMCPMC10705258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.