Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066947›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors.

Anja Lisjak, Bruna Correa Lopes, Rachel Pilla, Ana Nemec, Jan S Suchodolski, Nataša Tozon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Genome Analysis of CanineAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anja LisjakSmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bruna Correa LopesGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1234-599X
Rachel PillaGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7758-2609
Ana NemecSmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jan S SuchodolskiGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Nataša TozonSmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

Purina PetCare Research Excellence Fund The microbiome research at the Gastrointestinal Laboratory at Texas A&M University is in part funded by Purina PetCare Research Excellence FundSlovenian Research Agency P3-0428, P4-0053, J4-2546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to further describe the oral microbiota of healthy dogs by DNA shotgun sequencing and compare those to dogs with oral tumors. Oral swabs (representative of all niches of the oral cavity) were collected from healthy dogs (n = 24) and from dogs with different oral tumors (n = 7). DNA was extracted from the swabs and shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed. Only minor differences in microbiota composition were observed between the two groups. At the phylum level, the Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Desulfobacterota and Firmicutes were most abundant in both groups. Observed Operational Taxonomic Units-OTUs (species richness) was significantly higher in the healthy patients, but there was no significant difference in the Shannon diversity index between the groups. No significant difference was found in beta diversity between the groups. The core oral microbiota consisted of 67 bacterial species that were identified in all 24 healthy dogs. Our study provides further insight into the composition of the oral microbiota of healthy dogs and in dogs with oral tumors.

Indexed as

biopsyDNA shotgun sequencingdogsoral microbiotaoral swaboral tumors

Identifiers

PMID38066947
PMCPMC10705671
OpenAlexW4388857811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.