Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066912›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2023

CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive lymphomas-identifying prognostic and predictive markers.

Alberto Mussetti, Nicole Fabbri, Anna Sureda

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto MussettiDepartment of Hematology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicole FabbriDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Anna SuredaDepartment of Hematology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Duran i Reynals Hospital · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss different pre-infusion, post-infusion and post-CAR T-cell relapse prognostic factors influencing the outcomes of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas. Despite the overall positive results of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, a significant percentage of patients relapse. We summarize the efforts made to identify predictive factors for response and durable remissions and survival. In the pre-infusion setting, the patient-related factors discussed include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and comorbidities. Disease-related factors like tumor burden, histology, and biological features are also considered. In addition, inflammation-related factors and CAR T-cell product-related factors are considered. After CAR T-cell infusion, factors such as disease response assessed by 18FDG-PET/CT scan, liquid biopsy monitoring, and CAR T-cell expansion become crucial in predicting survival outcomes. Response to 18FDG-PET/CT scan is a widely used test for confirming response and predicting survival. Liquid biopsy, in combination with 18FDG-PET/CT scan, has shown potential in predicting outcomes. CAR T-cell expansion and persistence have shown mixed effects on survival, with some studies indicating their association with response. In the setting of post-CAR T-cell relapse, prognostic factors include refractory disease, time of relapse, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels at CAR T-cell infusion. Enrollment in clinical trials is crucial for improving outcomes in these patients. Overall, we discuss a comprehensive overview of prognostic factors that can influence the outcomes of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAntigens, CD19Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRecurrenceAntigens, CD19Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID38066912
PMCPMC10727003
OpenAlexW4389477838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.