ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2023
CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive lymphomas-identifying prognostic and predictive markers.
Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Systematic literature review to identify prognostic factors of efficacy and safety outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell therapies in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Confounder Identification in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Findings from an Expert Panel of German and Austrian Hematologists.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- A novel severe toxicity-free, and progression-free survival endpoint predicts outcomes after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Therapeutic outcomes of TP53-mutated diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Anbalcabtagene Autoleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Landmark-Based Evaluations of Long-Term Outcomes After CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Diurnal rhythm in chimeric antigen receptor T cell effectiveness in an observational study of 715 patients.JCI insight · 2026Observational
- Current Developments of CAR-T and CAR-NK Cell Therapies for Ovarian Cancer.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Cytomegaloviral Infections in Recipients of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: An Observational Study With Focus on Oncologic Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Autologous stem cell transplantation meets CAR-T therapy: A synergistic strategy for B-cell lymphoma.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We discuss different pre-infusion, post-infusion and post-CAR T-cell relapse prognostic factors influencing the outcomes of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas. Despite the overall positive results of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, a significant percentage of patients relapse. We summarize the efforts made to identify predictive factors for response and durable remissions and survival. In the pre-infusion setting, the patient-related factors discussed include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and comorbidities. Disease-related factors like tumor burden, histology, and biological features are also considered. In addition, inflammation-related factors and CAR T-cell product-related factors are considered. After CAR T-cell infusion, factors such as disease response assessed by 18FDG-PET/CT scan, liquid biopsy monitoring, and CAR T-cell expansion become crucial in predicting survival outcomes. Response to 18FDG-PET/CT scan is a widely used test for confirming response and predicting survival. Liquid biopsy, in combination with 18FDG-PET/CT scan, has shown potential in predicting outcomes. CAR T-cell expansion and persistence have shown mixed effects on survival, with some studies indicating their association with response. In the setting of post-CAR T-cell relapse, prognostic factors include refractory disease, time of relapse, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels at CAR T-cell infusion. Enrollment in clinical trials is crucial for improving outcomes in these patients. Overall, we discuss a comprehensive overview of prognostic factors that can influence the outcomes of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas, highlighting the need for personalized approaches in treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.