Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066896›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2023

A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma.

Francesca Gay, Giuseppe Bertuglia, Roberto Mina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multiple Myeloma Unpacked.Hematological oncology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca GayDivision of Hematology 1, Clinical Trial Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe BertugliaDivision of Hematology 1, Clinical Trial Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Roberto MinaDivision of Hematology 1, Clinical Trial Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a clinically and biologically highly heterogeneous disease, as the overall survival can vary from more than a decade in patients with standard risk disease treated with intensive chemotherapy to 2-3 years in patients with high-risk features. The current staging systems, which rely on baseline biological risk factors to stratify patients into groups with differing risks of progression or death, are sometimes suboptimal tools for identifying high-risk patients. This is particularly evident when considering the so-called functional high-risk patients-patients who do not necessarily display baseline high-risk features but typically show a suboptimal response to induction therapy or relapse early after treatment initiation: the survival of these patients is particularly poor even in the context of newer therapies. The prompt identification, as well as a consistent definition, of this subset of patients, as well as their management, currently represents an unmet medical need. In this review we explore the main characteristics of functional high-risk patients, the available known risk factors and scoring systems, and the possible management.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID38066896
PMCPMC10727111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.