ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2023
How to classify risk based on clinical and molecular modeling: integrating molecular markers in the risk assessment of myelodysplastic syndrome.
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell Lines in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) Research: A Review of Existing Models and Their Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), also known as "myelodysplastic neoplasm," is a heterogeneous group of clonal myeloid neoplasms that typically affects older adults. The clinical phenotype, symptoms, and complications relate to the depth of cytopenia and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The diagnosis of MDS relies on morphologic criteria, such as evidence of dysplasia, disordered maturation, and increasing blast counts, which separate the disease into histologic subtypes with different probabilities for progression to AML. The treatment of MDS is often risk-adapted depending on the prognostic profile of each patient's disease. There has been a coevolution of diagnostic and prognostic systems for MDS developed over the past 40 years, both of which have now incorporated molecular markers. The new International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) improves partitioning of patients compared to prior versions with resultant upgrading of 34% of patients into higher-risk groups due to the presence of mutations. The new IPSS-M also more accurately distinguishes intermediate-risk patients separating them into two tiers. The two new diagnostic classifications include MDS defined by mutations in SF3B1 and TP53, though there are differences in diagnostic criteria. Future efforts to refine MDS prognostication could investigate the interface between MDS and clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance, expand access to genomic testing, obtain results in a less invasive manner, and develop treatment-response predictors and dynamic risk models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.