Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066814›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Human AI Teaming for Coronary CT Angiography Assessment: Impact on Imaging Workflow and Diagnostic Accuracy.

Florian Andre, Philipp Fortner, Matthias Aurich, Sebastian Seitz, Ann-Kathrin Jatsch, Max Schöbinger, Michael Wels, Martin Kraus, Mehmet Akif Gülsün, Norbert Frey and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Florian AndreDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-2611
Philipp FortnerMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias AurichMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-4425
Sebastian SeitzMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin JatschMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-7784-2647
Max SchöbingerSiemens Healthineers, 91301 Forchheim, Germany.
Michael WelsSiemens Healthineers, 91301 Forchheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1239-1243
Martin KrausSiemens Healthineers, 91301 Forchheim, Germany.
Mehmet Akif GülsünSiemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Norbert FreyDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Andre SommerMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes GörichMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian J BussMVZ DRZ Heidelberg, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer · DESiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DEHeidelberg University · DESiemens (United States) · US

Funding

Siemens Healthcare (Germany) n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the number of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations is expected to increase, technologies to optimize the imaging workflow are of great interest. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve clinical workflow and diagnostic accuracy in high-volume cardiac imaging centers. A total of 120 patients (79 men; 62.4 (55.0-72.7) years; 26.7 (24.9-30.3) kg/m

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputed tomographycoronary artery diseasecoronary CT angiographyhuman AI teamingworkflow

Identifiers

PMID38066814
PMCPMC10706001
OpenAlexW4389205868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.