Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066702›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2024

Use of continuous genotypes for genomic prediction in sugarcane.

Seema Yadav, Elizabeth M Ross, Xianming Wei, Shouye Liu, Loan To Nguyen, Owen Powell, Lee T Hickey, Emily Deomano, Felicity Atkin, Kai P Voss-Fels and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seema YadavQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-7770
Elizabeth M RossQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7521-3671
Xianming WeiSugar Research Australia, Mackay, Queensland, Australia.
Shouye LiuInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Loan To NguyenQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-5466
Owen PowellQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-4286
Lee T HickeyQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6909-7101
Emily DeomanoSugar Research Australia, Indooroopilly, Queensland, Australia.
Felicity AtkinSugar Research Australia, Meringa Gordonvale, Queensland, Australia.
Kai P Voss-FelsQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0782-366X
Ben J HayesQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5606-3970
The University of Queensland · AUSugar Research Australia (Australia) · AU

Funding

Sugar Research Australia 2017/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection in sugarcane faces challenges due to limited genomic tools and high genomic complexity, particularly because of its high and variable ploidy. The classification of genotypes for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) becomes difficult due to the wide range of possible allele dosages. Previous genomic studies in sugarcane used pseudo-diploid genotyping, grouping all heterozygotes into a single class. In this study, we investigate the use of continuous genotypes as a proxy for allele-dosage in genomic prediction models. The hypothesis is that continuous genotypes could better reflect allele dosage at SNPs linked to mutations affecting target traits, resulting in phenotypic variation. The dataset included genotypes of 1318 clones at 58K SNP markers, with about 26K markers filtered using standard quality controls. Predictions for tonnes of cane per hectare (TCH), commercial cane sugar (CCS), and fiber content (Fiber) were made using parametric, non-parametric, and Bayesian methods. Continuous genotypes increased accuracy by 5%-7% for CCS and Fiber. The pseudo-diploid parametrization performed better for TCH. Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces model with Gaussian kernel and AK4 (arc-cosine kernel with hidden layer 4) kernel outperformed other methods for TCH and CCS, suggesting that non-additive effects might influence these traits. The prevalence of low-dosage markers in the study may have limited the benefits of approximating allele-dosage information with continuous genotypes in genomic prediction models. Continuous genotypes simplify genomic prediction in polyploid crops, allowing additional markers to be used without adhering to pseudo-diploid inheritance. The approach can particularly benefit high ploidy species or emerging crops with unknown ploidy.

Indexed as

SaccharumBayes TheoremGenomicsGenotypePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID38066702
PMCPMC12807373
OpenAlexW4389508807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.