Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066688›Full record

ArticlePerfusion2025

Surgical coronary angioplasty of both coronary ostia after chest radiotherapy. Is it good alternative to conventional coronary bypass surgery?

Arslan Mamedov, Eglė Rumbinaitė, Dainius Karčiauskas, Gabrielė Jakuškaitė, Audronė Veikutienė, Povilas Jakuška, Rimantas Benetis

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Perfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arslan MamedovDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sugery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Eglė RumbinaitėDepartament of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-2657-5745
Dainius KarčiauskasDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sugery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gabrielė JakuškaitėDepartament of Cardiology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-1618-3548
Audronė VeikutienėDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sugery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Povilas JakuškaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sugery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-3714-0704
Rimantas BenetisDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sugery, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIsolated coronary ostial stenosis of both ostia is a rare, potentially life-threatening condition, occurring in 0.1%-0.2% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 69-year-old woman with a past medical history of breast cancer, who had been treated with radiotherapy, which most likely caused significant stenosis of both coronary ostia and likely accelerated aortic stenosis. Surgical angioplasty with autopericardium patch reconstruction of the left main coronary artery and right coronary arteries due to proximal stenotic disease was performed instead of venous or arterial bypasses with concomitant aortic valve replacement. The postoperative course was uneventful. There were no cardiovascular events 5 years after operation, and the patient remained free of any symptoms.

conclusionsSurgical coronary angioplasty offers an alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in isolated coronary ostial lesions and is advantageous in restoring more physiological myocardial perfusion, especially in those cases when conduits are suspected to be fibrotic, scarred or stenosed after radiation therapy or if there is the need to preserve conduits for future myocardial revascularisation in young patients.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassCoronary StenosisAgedBreast NeoplasmsCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansRadiotherapyaortic valve stenosiscoronary artery diseasecoronary ostial stenosismyocardial revascularisationsurgical angioplasty

Identifiers

PMID38066688
PMCPMC11715061
OpenAlexW4389509016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.