Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066656›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2023

Cross-cultural adaptation of the CRS-PRO questionnaire into French.

Maxime Fieux, Florent Carsuzaa, Jeremy Charriot, Justin Michel, Fabien Subtil, Leigh J Sowerby, Thomas Radulesco, Valentin Favier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Italian Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcome. Questionnaire.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
  2. Thai Translation and Validation of Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Patient Reported Outcome (CRS-PRO).World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxime FieuxService d'ORL, d'otoneurochirurgie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495, Pierre-Bénite Cedex, France. maxime.fieux@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-2286
Florent CarsuzaaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and neck surgery, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Jeremy CharriotService de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.
Justin MichelENT - Head and Neck Surgery Department, APHM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Fabien SubtilService de Biostatistique et Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Leigh J SowerbyDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Thomas RadulescoENT - Head and Neck Surgery Department, APHM, La Conception University Hospital, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Valentin FavierService d'ORL et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34000, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), encompasses many different clinical patterns with variable response to treatment. Precise criteria specifying disease severity and control are lacking in the current literature. Our aim was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the CRS-PRO, creating a French version for use as a routine questionnaire in the assessment of patients with CRS.

methodsThe CRS-PRO questionnaire was translated according to the recommendations of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) through a three-step procedure including a backward translation.

resultsSeven of 12 items were initially discordant between the three translators before achieving consensus (Step 1). Two of 12 items were discordant between the backward translation and the initial CRS-PRO version regarding the word "mucus"(Step 2). Step 3 allowed the creation of a French proof-read version of the CRS-PRO questionnaire. Thirty patients were included for initial validation, mean age of 49.2 ± 15 years and 63.3% (19/30) male. It took them 67 ± 23 s to complete the questionnaire without any patients requiring more than 2 min.

conclusionThis study presents the French version of the CRS-PRO questionnaire-an adapted, validated, and well-accepted instrument to evaluate the CRS symptoms in the French speaking population.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAdultChronic DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic rhinosinusitisCross-culturalFrenchQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID38066656
PMCPMC10709834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.