ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2023
Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of prophylactic mesh in emergency midline laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Pooled it
- Current evidence and reported experiences for robot-assisted emergency general surgery: systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- CIRSE Standards of Practice for the Interventional Radiology Management of Acute and Chronic Arterial Mesenteric Ischaemia.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Guideline
- Long-Term Outcomes After Laparoscopic vs Open Adhesiolysis for Small Bowel Obstruction: The LASSO Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA surgery · 2026Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open emergency colonic resection for obstruction: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
- Presumed idiopathic omental hemorrhage mimicking complicated appendicitis: a rare case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Interhospital transfer and outcomes after robotic emergency general surgery: a national analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Outcomes of laparoscopic reoperation for anastomotic leak-associated peritonitis following colorectal cancer surgery: a comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Defining complex groin hernia and contextualizing approach selection: a three-round Delphi consensus framework.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Asystole Likely Due to a Vagal Reflex During Routine Gynecologic Surgery: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Individualized PEEP titration guided by static lung compliance reduces postoperative atelectasis in elderly patients during laparoscopic Trendelenburg surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Treat the patient, not the grade of injury: modern management of solid organ trauma in children.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic Surgery in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Visceral Trauma and Emergency General Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Laparoscopic-first approach for treating a small bowel injury in a patient stabilized after initial hemodynamic shock: a case report and video.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- "Results of the structured implementation of a robotic acute care surgery program".Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic management in perforation peritonitis: A prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Penetrating and Blunt Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in emergency gastrointestinal procedures: a review of current evidence and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
55 authors at 20 institutions in 20 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma.
methodsThis position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement.
resultsA total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma.
conclusionsThe WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.