ReviewBMC health services research2023
Challenges and strategies for conducting research in primary health care practice: an integrative review.
Review in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Investigation of primary health care service delivery models used in allied health practice in rural and remote areas of Australia: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and Associated Factors to Writing Case Reports Among Japanese General Medicine Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Japan Primary Care Association Members.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- The Time to Act Is Now: Strengthening Health Systems Research Capacity, Capability and Knowledge Translation in Remote Australia.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Cultivating a Culture of Research in Saudi Board Family Medicine Program.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Reconfiguring global primary care evidence: The essential role of regional journals.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026Article
- Assessment of Blood Pressure Control Among Hypertensive Patients Attending Primary Healthcare Settings in Qatar: A Retrospective Chart Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Article
- Competing epistemologies: a reflexive thematic analysis of research in general practice.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research (SPIDER) framework: Eight legs of success for running projects in primary care practices.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
- Two sides of the same coin: recruitment performance and perceived workload in primary care trials-insights from the AgeWell.de study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Multidisciplinary Care in a Public University Family Medicine Group in Québec (Canada): Data on Patients' Follow-Up and Cardiometabolic Risk Management.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring participants' characteristics and self-assessed readiness to conduct clinical trials in general practice - baseline analysis of the RaPHaeL practice-based research network.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- Factors affecting registered nurses' participation and utilisation of clinical research in Namibia.Curationis · 2025Article
- Article
- SWOT analysis of collaborative research among family physicians in Ghana: A workshop report.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Why Saudi Respiratory Therapists Struggle with Research: An Evidence-Based Analysis.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Exploring the Multidimensional Advantages of Productive Failure in Cultivating Clinical Thinking, Collaboration, Stress Management, and Learning Retention in Resident Physicians.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
- Community-based psychosocial support interventions to reduce stigma and improve mental health of people with infectious diseases: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024Article
- Identifying innovations produced by primary health care centers and evaluating their scalability: the SPRINT Occitanie cross-sectional study in France.BMC health services research · 2024Observational
- Protocol to develop a specialised curriculum in primary care cancer research in an Irish medical school.HRB open research · 2024Article
- Perceptions of healthcare finance and system quality among Nigerian healthcare workers.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding accessible and high-quality patient-centered healthcare remains a challenge in many countries, despite global efforts to strengthen primary health care (PHC). Research and knowledge management are integral to enhancing PHC, facilitating the implementation of successful strategies, and promoting the use of evidence-based practices. Practice-based research in primary care (PC-PBR) has emerged as a valuable approach, with its external validity to diverse PHC settings, making it an effective means of translating research findings into professional practice.
objectiveTo identify challenges and strategies for conducting practice-based research in primary health care services.
methodAn integrative literature review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lilacs databases. The research question, guided by the PICo framework, directed the execution of study selection and data extraction. Data analysis followed the RAdAR method's three phases: pre-analysis, data analysis, and interpretation of results.
resultsOut of 440 initially identified articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries, primarily the United States. The challenges and strategies for PC-PBR were categorized into six themes: research planning, infrastructure, engagement of healthcare professionals, knowledge translation, the relationship between universities and health services, and international collaboration. Notable challenges included research planning complexities, lack of infrastructure, difficulties in engaging healthcare professionals, and barriers to knowledge translation. Strategies underscore the importance of adapting research agendas to local contexts, providing research training, fostering stakeholder engagement, and establishing practice-based research networks.
conclusionThe challenges encountered in PC-PBR are consistent across various contexts, highlighting the need for systematic, long-term actions involving health managers, decision-makers, academics, diverse healthcare professionals, and patients. This approach is essential to transform primary care, especially in low- and middle-income countries, into an innovative, comprehensive, patient-centered, and accessible healthcare system. By addressing these challenges and implementing the strategies, PC-PBR can play a pivotal role in bridging the gap between research and practice, ultimately improving patient care and population health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.