Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066627›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2023

Challenges and strategies for conducting research in primary health care practice: an integrative review.

Daiana Bonfim, Lorrayne Belotti, Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida, Ilana Eshriqui, Sofia Rafaela Maito Velasco, Camila Nascimento Monteiro, Adelson Guaraci Jantsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reconfiguring global primary care evidence: The essential role of regional journals.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SWOT analysis of collaborative research among family physicians in Ghana: A workshop report.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daiana BonfimHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein Center for Studies, Research, and Practices in Primary Health Care and Networks, Sao Paulo, Brazil. bonfim.daiana@einstein.br.
Lorrayne BelottiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein Center for Studies, Research, and Practices in Primary Health Care and Networks, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leticia Yamawaka de AlmeidaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein Center for Studies, Research, and Practices in Primary Health Care and Networks, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ilana EshriquiHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein Center for Studies, Research, and Practices in Primary Health Care and Networks, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sofia Rafaela Maito VelascoHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein Center for Studies, Research, and Practices in Primary Health Care and Networks, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Nascimento MonteiroHospital Israelita Albert Einstein - Albert Einstein Center for Studies, Research, and Practices in Primary Health Care and Networks, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Adelson Guaraci JantschExecutive Secretariat of Organization Open University of the Unified Health System (UNASUS), Brasilia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding accessible and high-quality patient-centered healthcare remains a challenge in many countries, despite global efforts to strengthen primary health care (PHC). Research and knowledge management are integral to enhancing PHC, facilitating the implementation of successful strategies, and promoting the use of evidence-based practices. Practice-based research in primary care (PC-PBR) has emerged as a valuable approach, with its external validity to diverse PHC settings, making it an effective means of translating research findings into professional practice.

objectiveTo identify challenges and strategies for conducting practice-based research in primary health care services.

methodAn integrative literature review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Lilacs databases. The research question, guided by the PICo framework, directed the execution of study selection and data extraction. Data analysis followed the RAdAR method's three phases: pre-analysis, data analysis, and interpretation of results.

resultsOut of 440 initially identified articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries, primarily the United States. The challenges and strategies for PC-PBR were categorized into six themes: research planning, infrastructure, engagement of healthcare professionals, knowledge translation, the relationship between universities and health services, and international collaboration. Notable challenges included research planning complexities, lack of infrastructure, difficulties in engaging healthcare professionals, and barriers to knowledge translation. Strategies underscore the importance of adapting research agendas to local contexts, providing research training, fostering stakeholder engagement, and establishing practice-based research networks.

conclusionThe challenges encountered in PC-PBR are consistent across various contexts, highlighting the need for systematic, long-term actions involving health managers, decision-makers, academics, diverse healthcare professionals, and patients. This approach is essential to transform primary care, especially in low- and middle-income countries, into an innovative, comprehensive, patient-centered, and accessible healthcare system. By addressing these challenges and implementing the strategies, PC-PBR can play a pivotal role in bridging the gap between research and practice, ultimately improving patient care and population health.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelEvidence-Based PracticeHealth ServicesHumansPrimary Health CareHealth personnelPrimary health careResearchReview

Identifiers

PMID38066627
PMCPMC10709868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.