Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066535›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023

Definition of irreparable rotator cuff tear: a scoping review of prospective surgical therapeutic trials to evaluate current practice.

Fa-Chuan Kuan, Chien-An Shih, Wei-Ren Su, Ausberto Velasquez Garcia, Tomoyuki Kuroiwa, Naoya Iida, Kai-Lan Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fa-Chuan KuanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, 138 Sheng-Li Rd, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chien-An ShihDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, 138 Sheng-Li Rd, Tainan, Taiwan.
Wei-Ren SuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, 138 Sheng-Li Rd, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ausberto Velasquez GarciaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tomoyuki KuroiwaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Naoya IidaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kai-Lan HsuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, 138 Sheng-Li Rd, Tainan, Taiwan. dulendulen@gmail.com.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWMayo Clinic in Florida · USNational Cheng Kung University · TWUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe definition of irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) is controversial. This scoping review provides definitions used to describe IRCT in the literature. This scoping review (1) identified criteria used in the definition of IRCT and (2) investigated the current state of those criteria in prospective surgical therapeutic trials.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in March 2023. Studies were screened against predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Criteria regarding clinical symptoms, preoperative images, and intraoperative findings were captured respectively.

resultsA total of 41 prospective studies were eligible for inclusion, and 35 studies (85.4%) defined IRCT. IRCT was defined on the basis of the following main criteria: preoperative image findings (28/35), intraoperative findings (24/35), and symptoms (16/35). With regard to preoperative images, IRCT was mainly defined on the basis of retraction of the tendon in the coronal plane (22/28), the severity of fatty degeneration (19/28), and ruptured tendon number or width of the defect in the sagittal plane (17/28).

conclusionThis scoping review highlights the lack of a standardized definition for IRCT in clinical practice, with common predictive criteria including a duration of over 6 months, retraction beyond 5 cm, Goutallier grade 3 fatty infiltration, and the rupture of two or more tendons. However, surgeons should apply more than one criterion when examining preoperative images and confirm reparability during surgery. A more objective manner of evaluating intraoperative reparability is necessary.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesArthroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRotator CuffRuptureFatty degenerationIrreparable rotator cuff tearPatte gradeRetractionTangent sign

Identifiers

PMID38066535
PMCPMC10704799
OpenAlexW4389485392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.