Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066496›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Prevalence and predictors of cervical cancer screening among HIV-positive women in rural western Uganda: insights from the health-belief model.

Easwaran Vigneshwaran, Narayana Goruntla, Bhavana Reddy Bommireddy, Mohammad Jaffar Sadiq Mantargi, Bhavani Mopuri, Durga Prasad Thammisetty, Kasturi Vishwanathasetty Veerabhadrappa, Sarad Pawar Naik Bukke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Easwaran VigneshwaranDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Narayana GoruntlaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda. drgoruntla@kiu.ac.ug.
Bhavana Reddy BommireddyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER) - Autonomous, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Mohammad Jaffar Sadiq MantargiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmacy Program, Batterjee Medical College, 21442, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Bhavani MopuriDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER) - Autonomous, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Durga Prasad ThammisettyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Sri Padmavathi School of Pharmacy, Vaishnavi Nagar, Andhra Pradesh, Tiruchanoor, Tirupati, 517503, India.
Kasturi Vishwanathasetty VeerabhadrappaDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Sarad Pawar Naik BukkeDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology School of Pharmacy, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Kampala, Uganda.
Kampala International University · UGBatterjee Medical CollegeKing Khalid University · SASri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen living with HIV are at increased risk of developing cervical cancer (CC). Screening for cancer is an important preventive strategy for the early detection of precancerous lesions and its management. There has been inadequate evidence on cervical cancer screening (CCS) practices among HIV-positive women in rural western Uganda. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of CCS among HIV-positive women, as well as knowledge and practices regarding cervical cancer screening.

methodsA cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted among HIV-positive women attending HIV care facilities located in rural settings of western Uganda. A validated and interview-based data collection form was used to capture statistics regarding demographics, HIV care, obstetric profile, health belief constructs, and knowledge and history of CCS from the participants. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to correlate women's characteristics and health beliefs toward CCS practices.

resultsThe prevalence of CCS among HIV-positive women was found to be 39.1% (95%CI: 14.0-71.7). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that post-secondary education attainment (AOR = 3.21; 95%CI = 2.12-7.28), four years or more lapsing after being diagnosed as HIV-positive (AOR = 2.87; 95%CI = 1.34-6.13), having more than one child (AOR = 1.87; 95%CI = 1.04-3.35), antenatal care attendance (AOR = 1.74; 95%CI = 1.02-3.43), post-natal care attendance (AOR = 3.75; 95%CI = 1.68-5.89), and having good knowledge regarding CC (AOR = 1.26; 95%CI = 1.98-3.02) were positively associated with adherence to CCS among HIV-positive women in western Uganda. Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs like the perceived risk of developing CC (AOR = 1.82; 95%CI = 1.16-2.01), worries about developing CC (AOR = 5.01; 95%CI = 4.26-8.32), believing that CC leads to death (AOR = 2.56; 95%CI = 1.64-3.56), that screening assists in early identification (AOR = 2.12; 95%CI = 1.84-3.74) and treatment (AOR = 4.63; 95%CI = 2.78-6.43) of precancerous lesions, reducing the risk of mortality (AOR = 1.84; 95%CI = 1.12-2.75), and the reassurance provided by negative test results (AOR = 2.08; 95%CI = 1.33-4.22) were positively associated with adhering to CCS. A female doctor performing the screening (AOR = 2.02; 95%CI = 1.57-3.98) as well as offering a free screening service (AOR = 3.23; 95%CI = 1.99-4.38) were significantly associated with CCS. Meanwhile, screening being painful (AOR = 0.28; 95%CI = 0.12-0.45), expensive (AOR = 0.36; 95%CI = 0.24-0.53), time-consuming (AOR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.19-0.41), embarrassing (AOR = 0.02; 95%CI = 0.01-0.06), and the fear of positive results (AOR = 0.04; 95%CI = 0.02-0.10) were found to have a significant negative association with adhering to CCS.

conclusionsOnly one-third of HIV-positive women had undergone CCS. Variables including secondary education attainment, four years or more lapsing after being diagnosed as HIV-positive, having more than one child, antenatal care attendance, post-natal care attendance, and knowledge about CC were positively associated with CCS adherence. Educational programs should be geared towards the risk of CC, severity of cases, benefits of screening, and reducing barriers associated with screening, which can significantly improve cervical CCS among HIV-positive women. The study proposes the incorporation of free screening services and the inclusion of trained female staff in CC prevention policies to improve CCS.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPrecancerous ConditionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Belief ModelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyPrevalenceUgandaCervical cancerHealth belief modelHIVScreeningUgandaWomen

Identifiers

PMID38066496
PMCPMC10709934
OpenAlexW4389474654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.