Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066459›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

The reliability and suitability of strength assessments in frail and pre-frail older adults: recommendations for strength testing in older populations.

Bridgitte Swales, Gemma C Ryde, Iain Fletcher, Anna C Whittaker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03141879 (Assessing the Feasibility and Impact of an Adapted Resistance Training Intervention, Aimed at Improving the Multi-dimensional Health and Functional Capacity of Frail Older Adults in Residential Care Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03141879 naunknown statusnot on this map

Assessing the Feasibility and Impact of an Adapted Resistance Training Intervention, Aimed at Improving the Multi-dimensional Health and Functional Capacity of Frail Older Adults in Residential Care Settings: Protocol for a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BirminghamRan2019 to 2019Enrolled48ConditionsFrail Elderly Syndrome, Frailty, Physical ActivityArmsHUR equipment resistance training intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inter-Session Reliability of an Isometric Muscle Strength Protocol in Older Adults.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bridgitte SwalesFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK. bridgitte.swales@stir.ac.uk.
Gemma C RydeThe School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Iain FletcherInstitute for Sport and Physical Activity Research, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire, England, UK.
Anna C WhittakerFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK.
University of Stirling · GBUniversity of Bedfordshire · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifelong strength is fundamental to physical function, health, and quality of life. Reliable appropriate strength assessment measures for older adults play an important role in effective evaluation of baseline ability and exercise prescription to counter disease and disuse. This study aimed to investigate the within-session reliability of maximal isometric knee extension and flexion, hip abduction and adduction, and handgrip strength measures in frail and pre-frail older adults.

methodThe study was conducted at a residential care home in Birmingham, UK. All care home residents aged ≥ 65 years; pre-frail or frail according to the Fried Frailty phenotype criteria; able to speak and read English; not currently involved in any other clinical trial; without severe sensory impairments; and with a predicted life expectancy greater than the trial length were eligible. Maximal isometric lower limb testing was performed using specialised resistance training equipment and a portable measurement device, and grip strength was assessed using a portable dynamometer. All eligible participants attended a single testing session and performed three trials per measure. Peak force measures were obtained for analysis. Within-session reliability for each measure was calculated from repeated-measures analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and coefficients of variation (CV) with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsEleven frail and eleven pre-frail older adults participated in the study. Within-session absolute and relative measures were found to be reliable with the highest overall repeatability indicated between trial 2 and trial 3 for knee extension, hip abduction, and handgrip (CV ≤ 4.65%, ICC ≥ 0.96) with variation evident across all measures, except knee extension, from trial 1 to 2.

conclusionsOverall, maximal isometric strength in frail and pre-frail older adults with no previous testing experience can be measured with good to high reliability within their first testing session. An initial two familiarisation trials followed by two measurement trials is recommended to achieve the highest level of overall repeatability.

trial registrationThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03141879 on 05/05/2017.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyAgedHand StrengthHumansMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsFrailtyPhysical functionReliabilityStrengthStrength assessmentSuccessful ageing

Identifiers

PMID38066459
PMCPMC10704765
OpenAlexW4389485877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.