Trial reportBMC oral health2023
Comparison between platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus xenograft and alloplastic bone grafting materials in immediate implant placement: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05878392 (Comparison Between Different Filling Materials in Immediate Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between Different Filling Materials in Immediate Implant
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of cells and/or biologics combined with scaffolds in alveolar bone augmentation for implant site development.Journal of periodontology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Extended platelet rich fibrin versus allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Virtual bone-implant contact surface effect on implant stability in fresh extraction and healed sites: a pilot randomised clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- New technologies in oral reconstructive medicine: Consensus report of the AAP/OF/SEPA Workshop.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Current treatment concepts in implantology in oral and maxillofacial surgery in Germany.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- A Case Report: Immediate Implant Placement with PRF, Photogrammetry-Guided Workflow, and Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Restoration.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Short-Term Bone Healing in Anterior Maxillary Sockets Using L-PRF With or Without Synthetic HA/β-TCP: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Fibrin, Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft, or Spontaneous Healing for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Insights into the Current Management Techniques for Peri-Implant Gaps: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- AnBioinformation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of different gap filling materials in immediate implant in anterior and premolar regions of maxilla. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-six implants were inserted in patients seeking for replacement of non-restorable maxillary anterior and premolar teeth (esthetic zone) by immediate implant. Patients were randomly distributed into three equal groups, twelve implants in each group. Group 1 received Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) into the jumping distance, Group 2 received Xenograft into the jumping distance and Group 3 received Alloplastic bone grafting material into the jumping distance. Implant stability by measuring the changes in Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), peri-implant pocket depth, marginal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness were evaluated during follow up periods. All the clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis by One Way ANOVA test and the Post Hoc Tukey test.
resultsThis study involved 19 female patients and 17 male patients who received 36 dental implants. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding implant stability, peri-implant pocket depth and palatal bone loss, while there was a significant difference between PRF Group (Group 1) and the other Groups regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness.
conclusionPRF can be used as a gap filling material in conjunction with immediate implant placement, but other bone grafting materials give superior result regarding buccal bone loss and changes in buccal bone thickness.
trial registrationThe study was listed on www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov with registration number (NCT05878392) on 26/05/2023. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, approved the current study in compliance with the seventh revision of the Helsinki Declaration in 2013 (A0103023OS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.