Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2023
A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of sterile filtered human amniotic fluid for treatment of COVID-19.
Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04497389 (A Phase I/II Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Determine Safety and Feasibility of Using an Acellular Sterile Filtered Amniotic Fluid as a Treatment for COVID-19 Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I/II Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Determine Safety and Feasibility of Using an Acellular Sterile Filtered Amniotic Fluid as a Treatment for COVID-19 Patients
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous acellular human amniotic fluid prevents ischemic cardiac remodeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceAcellular human amniotic fluid (hAF) is an antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory fluid that has been used to treat various pro-inflammatory conditions. In a feasibility study, we have previously demonstrated that hAF could be safely administered to severely ill patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). The impact of acellular hAF on markers of systemic inflammation and clinical outcomes during COVID-19 infection remain unknown.
objectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of acellular, sterile processed intravenously administered hAF on markers of systemic inflammation during COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND
participantsThis single-center Phase I/II randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial enrolled adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients hospitalized for respiratory symptoms of COVID-19, including hypoxemia, tachypnea or dyspnea. The study was powered for outcomes with an anticipated enrollment of 60 patients. From 09/28/2020 to 02/04/2022 we enrolled and randomized 47 (of an anticipated 60) patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. One patient withdrew consent after randomization but prior to treatment. Safety outcomes to 30 days were collected through hospital discharge and were complete by the end of screening on 6/30/2022.
interventionsIntravenous administration of 10 cc sterile processed acellular hAF once daily for up to 5 days vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Blood biomarkers of inflammation, including C-Reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as safety outcomes.
resultsPatients who were randomized to hAF (n = 23) were no more likely to have improvements in CRP from baseline to Day 6 than patients who were randomized to placebo (n = 24) hAF: -5.9 [IQR -8.2, -0.6] vs placebo: -5.9 [-9.4, -2.05]; p = 0.6077). There were no significant differences in safety outcomes or adverse events. Secondary measures of inflammation including lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer and IL-6 were not statistically different from baseline to day 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the intravenous administration of 10 cc of hAF daily for 5 days did not result in statistically significant differences in either safety or markers of systemic inflammation compared to placebo, though we did not achieve our enrollment target of 60 patients.
trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04497389 on 04/08/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.