Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38066440›Full record

Observational studyBMC surgery2023

Textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy: a single-centre observational study.

Vered Buchholz, Riley Hazard, Dong-Kyu Lee, David S Liu, Wendell Zhang, Sharon Chen, Ahmed Aly, Stephen Barnett, Peter Le, Laurence Weinberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06662513 (An Australian Regional Hospital's Oesophagectomy Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06662513 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Australian Regional Hospital's Oesophagectomy Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorLaunceston General HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsOesophageal CancerArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Vered BuchholzDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Riley HazardDepartment of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Dong-Kyu LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
David S LiuDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Wendell ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sharon ChenDepartment of Anesthesia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ahmed AlyDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Stephen BarnettDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter LeDivision of Cancer Surgery, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Precinct, VIC, Australia.
Laurence WeinbergDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia. laurence.weinberg@austin.org.au.
Austin Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUDongguk University Ilsan Hospital · KRPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTextbook outcomes is a composite quality assurance tool assessing the ideal perioperative and postoperative course as a unified measure. Currently, its definition and application in the context of oesophagectomy in Australia is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy in a single referral centre of Australia and investigate the association between textbook outcomes and patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics.

methodsAn observational study was retrospectively performed on patients undergoing open, laparoscopic, or hybrid oesophagectomy between January 2010 and December 2019 in a single cancer referral centre. A textbook outcome was defined as the fulfillment of 10 criteria: R0 resection, retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes, no intraoperative complications, no postoperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade III, no anastomotic leak, no readmission to the ICU, no hospital stay beyond 21 days, no mortality within 90 days, no readmission related to the surgical procedure within 30 days from admission and no reintervention related to the surgical procedure. The proportion of patients who met each criterion for textbook outcome was calculated and compared. Selected patient-related parameters (age, gender, BMI, ASA score, CCI score), tumour-related factors (tumour location, tumour histology, AJCC clinical T and N stage and treatment-related factor [neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical approach]) were assessed. Disease recurrence and one year survival were also evaluated.

results110 patients who underwent oesophagectomy were included. The overall textbook outcome rate was 24%. The difference in rates across the years was not statistically significant. The most achieved textbook outcome parameters were 'no mortality in 90 days' (96%) and 'R0 resection' (89%). The least frequently met textbook outcome parameter was 'no severe postoperative complications' (58%), followed by 'no hospital stays over 21 days' (61%). No significant association was found between patient, tumour and treatment characteristics and the rate of textbook outcome. Tumour recurrence rate and overall long term survival was similar between textbook outcome and non-textbook outcome groups. Patients with R0 resection, no intraoperative complication and a hospital stay less than 21 days had reduced mortality rates.

conclusionsTextbook outcome is a clinically relevant indicator and was achieved in 24% of patients. Severe complications and a prolonged hospital stay were the key criteria that limited the achievement of a textbook outcome. These findings provide meticulous evaluation of oesophagectomy perioperative care and provide a direction for the utilisation of this concept in identifying and improving surgical and oncological care across multiple healthcare levels.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyAnastomotic LeakHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnaesthesiaCancerComplicationsCostsOesophagectomySurgeryTextbook outcome

Identifiers

PMID38066440
PMCPMC10704701
OpenAlexW4389482196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.